Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

The impact of the yield curve's potential super-steepening cycle

Jason Goepfert
2020-06-25
Based on consumer attitudes, it seems likely that the yield curve is in the midst of a long-term super steepening cycle. There have been four other cycles in the past 40 years, leading to mixed returns for stocks and most other assets, but good returns for bonds and some defensive sectors.

In recent notes, we've shown that U.S. consumers are increasingly confident about the future relative to the present. They feel that their current troubles are temporary and the economy will soon be growing again.

The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday showed that this difference in confidence based on time frames has had an extremely strong correlation to the yield curve.

Indeed it has, and it suggests that the 2/10 yield curve is in for a super-steepening cycle.

To see what that might mean for various markets, sectors, and factors, the tables below show their returns through the four major steepening cycles on a price-return and annualized basis, including dividends or inflation.

The first two cycles coincided with double-digit annualized gains in the S&P 500, while the last two were terrible times for stocks. The dollar declined during three out of the four cycles, while 10-year Treasury futures rallied.

Among sectors, the only winner during all four cycles was consumer staples. People gotta eat and drink and smoke. The less-bad sectors included energy, health care, and financials. Technology stocks were volatile, along with communications.

In recent notes (here and here), we've seen how far technology has outpaced industrial and financial stocks. If we look at the ratio of tech to those two sectors during the four cycles, the only one when tech meaningfully outpaced them was during the last one.

For factors, there was no clear winner. All of them show two losses and two gains.

The table below shows ratios between the factors, to see if there was any pattern to what type of stock did better during these cycles.

Cyclical stocks underperformed defensive ones during all four cycles, which isn't a huge surprise given that consumer staples was the only sector to show a positive return all four times.

We're dealing with a tiny sample size, and as always this time could be different. With a small sample, the precedents need to be extremely consistent to have even a small chance that it could tell us something. From the table, about the only suggestion we can make is that the chance we're in a super-steepening cycle has increased, and defensive stocks (namely consumer staples) are more likely to outperform in the years ahead.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.