Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Energy Bad News and Good News - Part II

Jay Kaeppel
2021-08-23
In Part I, we highlighted that the energy sector had made little net headway between late August and late October over the course of many decades. How that period will play out this year remains anyone's guess. At the same time, a relatively new and very useful indicator suggests a more favorable outlook for the energy sector over the next full 12-months. We highlight this indicator and its current status here in Part II.

In Part I here, we highlighted that the energy sector during the late-August through late-October period has historically been basically a coin-flip, with an overall negative performance over the past 68 years (i.e., the Bad News).

This piece will highlight a potentially positive development for the energy sector (i.e., the Good News).

SECTOR COMPONENT CORRELATION

A recent addition to the Sentimentrader indicator lineup in Sector Component Correlation. If it sounds complicated, it's not. In fact, the underlying theory is extremely straightforward.

When a sector as a whole is performing well:

  • There tend to be "leaders", "laggards" and "tagalongs". As the names imply, the leaders outperform the other stocks in the sector, the laggards are the weak sisters in the group, and everyone else (the tagalongs) is pretty much just along for the ride
  • When a sector is performing well, investors tend to do a lot of analysis and often focus on trying to find the "best" stocks in that sector to buy and hold

On the other hand, when a sector as a whole falls out of favor:

  • There is often a "guilt by association" phenomenon, and the "baby gets thrown out with the bathwater," so to speak
  • When investors decide it's time to dump a sector, they are much less discerning. And they dump stocks in the sector en masse

As a result, generally speaking:

  • When a sector is performing well, there tends to be a lower degree of correlation among the stocks in the sector (as some lead and some lag)
  • When a sector is performing poorly, there tends to be a much higher degree of correlation among the stock in the sector as "everything" get sold

Fortunately, Jason and Eric figured out how to build this into an indicator. To get a sense of this, peruse the chart below.

Note that the tendency for the indicator value to increase (i.e., exhibit higher correlation) during price declines and drift lower (i.e., exhibit lower correlation) during price advances. 

For our purpose, we will go to the extreme and look for readings above 0.84%, as highlighted in the chart below.

XLE COMPONENT CORRELATION

To run this test, you can click this link. The input screens appear below.

The output screen appears in the chart below.

The key thing to note is the performance of ticker XLE (Energy Select Sector SPDR) over the ensuing 12 months, as shown in the table below.

ZEROING IN

To get a better sense of what this all means, let's consider the performance of the S&P 500 Energy Sector if held ONLY when in the past 12 months the XLE Component Correlation:

  • HAS been at 0.84 or higher
  • HAS NOT been at 0.84 or higher

The chart below displays the hypothetical equity curve for the S&P 500 Energy Sector held ONLY IF the indicator HAS been above 0.84 in the past 12 months.

The chart below displays the hypothetical equity curve for the S&P 500 Energy Sector held ONLY IF the indicator HAS NOT been above 0.84 in the past 12 months.

Notice any difference in the charts above?

While neither is uniformly bullish nor bearish, the difference in performance and the overall trend is fairly obvious.

SUMMARY

So, the "good news" for energy stocks is that the XLE Component Correlation is presently above 0.84, which implies that this indicator will remain "bullish" for at least another 12 months. 

Does this "guarantee" higher energy stock prices?  Absolutely not!  But a 96% 12-month Win Rate from previous readings can certainly be viewed as a positive influence.

Is this enough to justify holding energy stocks during the months directly ahead - given the wildly inconsistent performance during late-August to late-October highlighted here in Part I? 

That's a decision each investor has to make for themselves.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.