Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : For the 1st time in months, oil rigs come back online; Traders seem positive on stocks, negative on indexes

Jason Goepfert
2020-10-14
To save money, energy companies idled hundreds of rigs over the summer. That has just begun to change as a few come back online. When rig counts plunge then start to recover, it has been a positive long-term sign for energy stocks, but not so much for oil prices.; Over the past few sessions, options traders have been trading calls more heavily than puts on stocks. But on indexes, it's flipped, with more puts than calls. There has never been this extreme of a difference. Other times it seems like traders were hedging their bets with index puts, stocks mostly rose.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


For the 1st time in months, oil rigs come back online: To save money, energy companies idled hundreds of rigs over the summer. That has just begun to change as a few come back online. When rig counts plunge then start to recover, it has been a positive long-term sign for energy stocks, but not so much for oil prices.

Traders seem positive on stocks, negative on indexes: Over the past few sessions, options traders have been trading calls more heavily than puts on stocks. But on indexes, it's flipped, with more puts than calls. There has never been this extreme of a difference. Other times it seems like traders were hedging their bets with index puts, stocks mostly rose.

Two weeks of (kind of) big moves: After a period of relative stability, the S&P 500 has moved at least 0.5% each day for the past 11 sessions, as noted by strategist Callie Cox. When stocks have rallied and then start to swing, the old market cliche is that it's a sign of a trend change. Below, we can see every time something similar occurred. It did not precede anything bad over the next 2-3 months, but those longer-term returns weren't great.

Investors leave stocks, love bonds: In the 3 weeks ending October 7, investors pulled an average of more than $15 billion per week from equity funds (mutual and exchange-traded). The Backtest Engine shows this has been a constant theme since May, but prior to that it only triggered near the market bottoms in August 2011 and December 2018 during the past decade (it also triggered early during the financial crisis). They shoveled money into bond funds, which attracted more than $25.7 billion during the first week of October alone. That's the 3rd-highest weekly inflow out of all 835 weeks since 1997.

Bottom Line:

  • A positive environment favors becoming aggressive on signs of excessive pessimism.
  • Market environment (More info)
    PositivesNegatives
    1. Price pattern (barely)1. % of Stocks in Correction
    2. Moving averages
    3. McClellan Summation

    4. % Stocks > 200-Day
    5. Net New Highs / Lows
  • Sentiment / Breadth / Other
    PositivesNegatives
    1. Big up volume1. Confidence high and declining
    2. Surging small-caps2. Too much options speculation
    3. Surging tech stocks3. Equities high vs GDP, Assets
    4. Mar-May thrusts, recoveries4. IPO market too hot
    5. Hedgers net long
    6. Excess liquidity is high
  • Other Sectors and Assets
    PositivesNegatives
    1. Energy (here, here, and here)1. Skewed tech (here and here)

    2. Dollar test

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 27% Dumb Money Confidence: 72%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

For the 1st time in months, oil rigs come back online

BOTTOM LINE
To save money, energy companies idled hundreds of rigs over the summer. That has just begun to change as a few come back online. When rig counts plunge then start to recover, it has been a positive long-term sign for energy stocks, but not so much for oil prices.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
XLE -- Up, Long-Term

The oil and gas industry has been devastated in the past year, triggering layoffs and dividend cuts, something energy executives hold off as a last resort.

They were quicker in paring other expenses. The number of oil and gas rigs peaked almost 2 years ago and has been in freefall ever since.

The Baker Hughes Rig Count fell from a peak of 888 in November 2018 to only 172 by mid-August of this year, a plunge of more than 80%. But even though the news flow for this sector has been atrocious, a few rigs have come back online. For the first time since March, the count has started to increase.

Per Bloomberg (emphasis added):

"A rotary rig rotates the drill pipe from surface to drill a new well (or sidetracking an existing one) to explore for, develop and produce oil or natural gas. The Baker Hughes Rotary Rig count includes only those rigs that are significant consumers of oilfield services and supplies and does not include cable tool rigs, very small truck mounted rigs or rigs that can operate without a permit. Non-rotary rigs may be included in the count based on how they are employed. For example, coiled tubing and workover rigs employed in drilling new wells are included in the count. To be counted as active a rig must be on location and be drilling or 'turning to the right'. A rig is considered active from the moment the well is 'spudded' until it reaches target depth or 'TD'.  Rigs that are in transit from one location to another, rigging up or being used in non-drilling
activities such as workovers, completions or production testing, are NOT counted as active. Miscellaneous rig counts represent geothermal rigs."

When the Rig Count rises at least 10% from its low after falling more than 50% from a multi-year peak, it has been a good long-term sign for the energy sector.

Rig counts tend to be a slow-moving series since these firms can't simply turn wells on and off with a switch. When they started adding capacity after a plunge, then companies in the S&P Energy Sector index had a strong tendency to rally over the next 9-24 months. The risk/reward and probability of a large gain/loss was most impressive over the next 2 years.

The same was true for oil and gas companies. They tend to swing more in boom/bust cycles than the broader energy sector, and so the returns were more extreme.

While this has been a good long-term sign for energy companies, for oil itself, it was a different story. As noted by Oilprice.com,

"Baker Hughes reported on Friday that the number of oil rigs in the United States rose by 4 to 193—a gain that may push prices down further."

Indeed, it's been tough for crude to hold gains in the short- to medium-term after rig counts start to tick up from a low. Every one of the signals showed a loss either 1 or 2 months later, and even a year later there were only 2 gains out of the 6 signals. 

Positive signs in this sector are hard to come by, on a fundamental, macro, or technical basis. That's typically when the only potential positive comes from a sentiment standpoint, and signs are building that that's where we are in this cycle. When it gets to this point, usually the stocks will rally when investors realize things are getting "less bad" and rig counts may be one factor in shifting that sentiment.


Traders seem positive on stocks, negative on indexes

BOTTOM LINE
Over the past few sessions, options traders have been trading calls more heavily than puts on stocks. But on indexes, it's flipped, with more puts than calls. There has never been this extreme of a difference. Other times it seems like traders were hedging their bets with index puts, stocks mostly rose.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

Earlier this week, we saw that options traders are once again increasing their speculative bets. It's not yet to a level equalling the frenzy in August, but it's getting there.

Over the past few days, there has been an interesting twist to this data. Volume in equity options has heavily skewed toward calls; volume in index options has skewed toward puts.

The 3-day average of the CBOE Index Put/Call Ratio is in the top 95% of its range over the past year. The average of the Equity Put/Call Ratio is in the bottom 5% of its range. Going back more than 20 years, this has never happened at the same time.

If we relax the parameters to get a larger sample size, then we can get a sense of whether this might be another warning sign. 

It really hasn't been. While it's dangerous to assign reasons for any indicator, it looks like traders have started to establish hedges on major indexes as a check against some bets that individual stocks will keep rising. We can't quite know that from the volume figures, but there's a pretty good chance that's what's happening.

When traders behaved this way, then there was a 29% chance of a larger-than-average rise in the S&P 500 at some point over the next month, and 0% chance of a larger-than-average drop. Whenever we see 0% or 100%, it should not be taken literally - of course, there's a chance of a large decline. The point is to show that historically, there has been a better probability of a big rise than a big decline over that time frame.

It's usually instructive to also look at the inverse to see if the pattern flips. The table below shows those times when both the Index P/C and Equity P/C Ratios were in the bottom ends of their 1-year ranges.

These signals preceded returns that were quite a bit weaker than the scenario we're in now, adding a bit of confidence to the idea that traders' behavior right now is relatively benign for the shorter-term.

That's hard to square with the data we looked at on Monday, but that tends to have a longer time frame. And it isn't quite at a level as the extremes in August, as well as being in a more positive environment now vs. then.  


Active Studies

Click here to view the Active Research on the site.
Time FrameBullishBearish
Short-Term00
Medium-Term48
Long-Term482

Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 5%
Bullish for Stocks

S&P 500 Down Pressure
VIX
Inverse ETF Volume
NYSE Up Volume Ratio
CSFB Fear Barometer
% Showing Optimism: 33%
Bearish for Stocks

Smart Money / Dumb Money Confidence Spread
Intermediate Term Optimism Index (Optix)
Smart Money Confidence
Dumb Money Confidence
% Showing Excess Optimism
% Showing Excess Pessimism
Fidelity Funds Breadth
NYSE High/Low Ratio
Rydex Ratio
Rydex Money Market %
Equity Put/Call Ratio
OEX Open Interest Ratio
Equity Put/Call Ratio De-Trended
Options Speculation Index
ROBO Put/Call Ratio
NAAIM Exposure Index
Retail Money Market Ratio
NYSE Available Cash
Mutual Fund Cash Level
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio

Portfolio

PositionDescriptionWeight %Added / ReducedDate
Stocks15.6% RSP, 10.1% VWO, 7.6% XLE33.3Added 11%2020-10-08
Bonds10% BND, 10% SCHP, 10% ANGL29.7Reduced 0.1%2020-10-02
CommoditiesGCC2.4Reduced 2.1%
2020-09-04
Precious MetalsGDX4.6Added 5%2020-09-09
Special Situations0.0Reduced 5%2020-10-02
Cash30.0
Updates (Changes made today are underlined)

It's been a really mixed picture lately. In stocks, we saw huge momentum and a spike in speculation, then September managed to wring much of that out, except in the options market which is still a worry. There seem to be offsetting positives and negatives, with a mixed market environment, not the kind of setup where I feel comfortable being aggressive.

I did add a bit to energy. The older I get, the less interested I am in short-term gyrations, and I don't really care about the coming days or even weeks. I'm fairly confident that the total return will be positive over a longer time frame given some of the developments we've looked in over the past week.

With bonds, I decided to swap TLT for ANGL, a high-yield corporate fund with a heavy focus on energy bonds. Hedgers are heavily short 10-year Treasuries, and the high-yield market has held up well internally.

I'm not generally a fan of buying into rising prices, but with the internal recovery in emerging markets from a compelling position (here and here), I started a position.


RETURN YTD:  -0.3%

2019: 12.6%, 2018: 0.6%, 2017: 3.8%, 2016: 17.1%, 2015: 9.2%, 2014: 14.5%, 2013: 2.2%, 2012: 10.8%, 2011: 16.5%, 2010: 15.3%, 2009: 23.9%, 2008: 16.2%, 2007: 7.8%

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.