Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : Fund managers think tech is crowded to a record degree

Jason Goepfert
2020-09-16
Fund managers polled by BofA suggest that tech stocks are the most crowded trade in markets right now. Not only that, they're crowded to a record degree. But a look at the history of these most-crowded trades shows that the managers had only modest success at top-ticking the assets.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


Fund managers think tech is crowded to a record degree: Fund managers polled by BofA suggest that tech stocks are the most crowded trade in markets right now. Not only that, they're crowded to a record degree. But a look at the history of these most-crowded trades shows that the managers had only modest success at top-ticking the assets.

Dollar sentiment bounces back: Many markets are highly sensitive to each other at the moment, with interest rates tied closely to the dollar (and gold) which in turn have been tightly linked to stocks, especially the high-growth tech names. The Optimism Index on the dollar has bounced from extreme pessimism, as Troy mentioned in a premium note.  When its Optix cycled from 20 to 40 in the past, the dollar usually fell further over the next 2 weeks, especially if we focus on the past 20 years. If it bucks this consistent trend and rallies, then it suggests the mostly negative long-term trend has changed.

Bottom Line:

  • Weight of the evidence has been suggesting flat/lower stock prices short- to medium-term, which moderated somewhat with recent weakness; still suggesting higher prices long-term
  • Dumb Money Confidence was recently above 80% with evidence of skyrocketing speculation which increased during a down week, typically a bad sign when combined with an unhealthy environment, though that's turning more neutral, and failures were approaching record length
  • Active Studies show a heavy positive skew over the longer-term mostly thanks to the March/April/May breadth thrusts, recoveries, and trend changes
  • Signs of extremely skewed preference for tech stocks neared exhaustion by late June, especially relative to industrials and financials (here and here)
  • Indicators and studies for other markets are showing less consistent forward results

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 37% Dumb Money Confidence: 67%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

Fund managers think tech is crowded to a record degree

BOTTOM LINE
Fund managers polled by BofA suggest that tech stocks are the most crowded trade in markets right now. Not only that, they're crowded to a record degree. But a look at the history of these most-crowded trades shows that the managers had only modest success at top-ticking the assets.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

A new bull market has begun.

At least, that's the take from the latest results of the monthly Global Fund Manager Survey conducted by Bank of America. The survey of more than 200 asset managers, with nearly $650 billion under management, reflects views through September 10.

Since a new bull market has begun and technology stocks are leading the charge, it makes sense that the managers are the most overweight that sector.

And yet despite being the most overweight in that sector, the managers also believe it's the most crowded trade. They're heavily overweight, more than any other sector or asset...and so is everyone else.

According to Michael Hartnett, Chief Investment Strategist at BofA Securities, if you're long technology stocks in the U.S. then you're a part of the most “crowded trade” of all-time. Managers believe that a tech bubble is the second-biggest tail risk this month, outweighed by a Covid-19 second wave. Volatility surrounding the U.S. presidential election was in 3rd place among concerns.

Below, we can see just how extreme this is relative to other "most crowded" trades over the past 7 years.

This is where we get to the "So what?" question that we try to answer every time one of our indicators reaches a notable extreme, there is a remarkable market development, or something gets a lot of attention in the media.

The question with this survey, especially the most crowded trade, is "Should we fade the crowd?"

We've gone back and computed the returns for each of the assets noted in the "most crowded" table above. Because we're assuming that we should trade against wherever the trade is most crowded, we'll short the asset if the crowd is long, and we'll go long if the crowd is short.

For example, if the most crowded trade is short the Japanese yen (relative to the U.S. dollar), then we'll be contrarians and go long the yen. If the crowd has rushed into FANG stocks, then we'll be reckless and sell them short. The table below shows the results of these trades based on various hold times.

If the returns are positive, then it might be a good idea to fade the herd. If not, then following the momentum would be a better strategy.

Overall, it was not a very successful contrary indicator. While these managers did tend to do a good job of determining what was driving most investors each month, that didn't necessarily mean the trends were about to end.

If you bet against the most-crowded asset or sector each month and held on until the next month, then you would have won only 42% of the time. The average trade was positive, but the median was negative, meaning that there were some big positive outliers that impacted the overall average - thanks to our short in Bitcoin near the peak and going long the VIX the next month. 

These returns are theoretical only, for example, it would have been hard to get a return of more than 100% by shorting Bitcoin. The idea isn't necessarily to create a trading strategy, rather it's to get a general sense of whether we should use this widely-cited data as a reason to fade the crowd or otherwise adjust our positions.

The bottom line is that these managers are likely correct in that the most-crowded trade right now is tech stocks. There is a modest chance that it's so crowded, tech is likely to fall. But based solely on this survey's success at identifying too-crowded trades, we wouldn't use it in isolation to sell these stocks.


Active Studies

Click here to view the Active Research the site.
Time FrameBullishBearish
Short-Term01
Medium-Term112
Long-Term472

Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 11%
Bullish for Stocks

VIX
Inverse ETF Volume
Rydex Beta Chase Index
SPY Liquidity Premium
CSFB Fear Barometer
Mutual Fund Flow (no ETFs)
AAII Bull Ratio
% Showing Optimism: 37%
Bearish for Stocks

Smart Money / Dumb Money Confidence Spread
Intermediate Term Optimism Index (Optix)
Short-term Optimism Index (Optix)
Dumb Money Confidence
% Showing Excess Optimism
NYSE High/Low Ratio
S&P 500 Down Pressure
Rydex Ratio
Rydex Money Market %
Equity Put/Call Ratio
VIX Term Structure
OEX Open Interest Ratio
Total Put/Call Ratio
SKEW Index
Options Speculation Index
AIM (Advisor and Investor Model)
ROBO Put/Call Ratio
Retail Money Market Ratio
NYSE Available Cash
Mutual Fund Cash Level
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio

Portfolio

PositionWeight %Added / ReducedDate
Stocks15.2Reduced 4.2%2020-09-03
Bonds30.0Added 30%2020-09-09
Commodities2.4Reduced 2.1%
2020-09-04
Precious Metals5.0Added 5%2020-09-09
Special Situations4.9Added 5.1%2020-09-03
Cash42.5
Updates (Changes made today are underlined)

After stocks bottomed on March 23rd, they enjoyed a historic buying thrust and retraced a larger amount of the decline than "just a bear market rally" tends to. Through June, there were signs of breadth thrusts, recoveries, and trend changes that have an almost unblemished record at preceding higher prices over a 6-12 month time frame.

On a shorter-term basis, our indicators have been showing high optimism, with Dumb Money Confidence recently above 80%, along with signs of reckless speculation during what appears to be an unhealthy market environment, historically a bad combination. While there are certainly some outlier indicators that are showing apathy or even outright pessimism, a weight-of-the-evidence approach suggests high risk over a multi-week to multi-month time frame.

That has been the case since July, even arguably June and yet the major indexes hit continual new highs through late August. With the indicators and studies failing to precede any weakness, I've been hesitant to lower my already-low exposure. I am getting increasingly anxious about the oddities we're seeing, though, and lowered it again. This account is mostly about comfort with risk for me, and right now I'm not at all comfortable with any of it. In more than 25 years of experience, this is the oddest market I've ever seen.

I lowered exposure again - likely the lowest I'm willing to go at this point given longer-term positives - and decided to switch to an equal-weight version of the S&P 500 index. I've become intensely uncomfortable with the concentration in the cap-weighted index. Our studies have been mixed with regard to the potential for the equal-weight version to outperform the cap version going forward, so historical support isn't overwhelming. I'm also increasingly interested again in energy stocks, starting with a small allocation. I got burned in March with the unprecedented geopolitical spat that hammered those stocks then but the longer-term setup is decent.

In this account, I’ve roughly followed what has become known as the All Weather portfolio popularized by Ray Dalio. It allocates across four broad assets, designed to hold up no matter the market environment. The goal is modest positive returns while limiting large, sustained losses. I typically use popular ETFs, with low costs. At times, I will swap out for a fund I believe has better prospects, or simply lower fees if not. At other times, I will diverge quite a bit from baseline allocations, largely depending on the indicators and studies we discuss on the site. I've gotten away from this in the past, using "cash" as a substitute for "bonds" and with rates stuck at 0%, that has become less appetizing. I'm trying to get back more toward the baselines with less dramatic swings in either direction.

The base allocation I use is the following:

Stocks: 35%
Bonds: 45%
Precious Metals: 7.5%
Commodities: 7.5%
Cash / Special Opportunities: 5%


RETURN YTD:  -0.2%

2019: 12.6%, 2018: 0.6%, 2017: 3.8%, 2016: 17.1%, 2015: 9.2%, 2014: 14.5%, 2013: 2.2%, 2012: 10.8%, 2011: 16.5%, 2010: 15.3%, 2009: 23.9%, 2008: 16.2%, 2007: 7.8%

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.