Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : New lows tick higher even with historic year-ago comparisons

Jason Goepfert
2021-03-24
With some weakness this week, there was a flip in the percentage of securities trading at 52-week lows versus those at 52-week highs. There hasn't been a protracted divergence, often seen near major peaks, but it's not necessary. And it likely won't happen given how far the median stock is above its 52-week low.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


New lows tick higher even with historic year-ago comparisons: With some weakness this week, there was a flip in the percentage of securities trading at 52-week lows versus those at 52-week highs. There hasn't been a protracted divergence, often seen near major peaks, but it's not necessary. And it likely won't happen given how far the median stock is above its 52-week low.

Emerging downtrend: Emerging market stocks have been getting hit hard with a rise in the dollar. The EEM fund is now down 10% from its peak. Using an index with more history, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, it has suffered 15 other corrections following at least a 3-year high. Based on its prior behavior, bulls have to hope the current decline will unfold differently than the base case.

Bottom Line:

See the Outlook & Allocations page for more details on these summaries

STOCKS: Weak sell
The extreme speculation registered in January and February is starting to get wrung out. Internal dynamics have mostly held up, so a return to neutral sentiment conditions would improve the forward risk/reward profile substantially. We're still a ways off from that.

BONDS: Weak buy
Various parts of the market have been hit in recent weeks, with mild oversold conditions. The Bond Optimism Index is now about as low as it gets during healthy bond market environments. Fixed income isn't responding well, so that needs to be monitored in case it's transitioning to a longer-term negative market environment.

GOLD: Weak buy
A dollar trying to rebound from a severe short position has weighed on gold and miners. The types of signals they've given in recent weeks, within the context of their recent surge, have usually resulted in higher prices over a medium- to long-term time frame. Like bonds, gold and miners aren't responding very well, and this needs to be monitored.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 27% Dumb Money Confidence: 71%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

New lows tick higher even with historic year-ago comparisons

BOTTOM LINE
With some weakness this week, there was a flip in the percentage of securities trading at 52-week lows versus those at 52-week highs. There hasn't been a protracted divergence, often seen near major peaks, but it's not necessary. And it likely won't happen given how far the median stock is above its 52-week low.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

One of the major developments we've been watching for ever since there was overwhelming evidence of excessive optimism is weakening internals.

That can take any number of forms, and for the most part, we haven't really seen it.

One of the clearest ways to look for this is the net percentage of securities on the NYSE that reach 52-week highs versus 52-week lows. After the surge in new highs in early March, there was a minor divergence as those figures weakened even as the S&P 500 made a new high, but it wasn't major.

More concerning is that by Tuesday, there were more 52-week lows than 52-week highs. We can see the stark difference in forward returns in the chart below when this metric is below zero. It's also a worry that this has flipped so soon after a new high in the S&P, triggering the Titanic Syndrome noted in Tuesday's Daily Report.

When the S&P peaked last year, there was more of a divergence but even that wasn't too major. And when stocks peaked, there were still many more issues hitting new highs than new lows.

The peak prior to that, in September 2018, was much more pronounced. Even as stocks were hitting new highs, there were actually more new lows on the NYSE than new highs. Major warning sign.

The big rally at the end of 2017 and into early 2018 didn't show any major divergence before stocks peaked.

The reason we shouldn't expect a divergence this time is simply how far stocks have traveled. Across all the major equity indexes, and throwing in over-the-counter stocks just because they have seen such a tremendous surge of interest, the median stock is up more than 100% from its lows.

That's more than the initial recoveries off the bear market bottoms in 2003 and 2009.

Among the indexes, we can see just how much the average stock has rallied.

If we go back to the other two times when the median stock was at least 80% above its 52-week low, then we can see if there were divergences then between the S&P 500 and the NYSE Net New High / New Low line.

In early 2004, when the median stock was more than 80% above its low, breadth was still very strong and there was no divergence before stocks slumped into months of choppy downside.

Same goes for early 2010, when the median stock had doubled off its financial crisis low.

Based on this, we're not likely to see the 52-week low list grow any time soon. The average stock has skyrocketed off its low from a year ago, so it will take either a massive decline, or simply more time to generate easier 52-week comparisons, before the list will grow and potentially trigger a divergence with indexes like the S&P. Those divergences, while a warning sign if present, are not required before stocks correct. The more the net percentage of securities remains below zero, the more risk there is of a weakening market.


Active Studies

Click here to view the Active Research on the site.
Time FrameBullishBearish
Short-Term00
Medium-Term210
Long-Term164

Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 10%
Bullish for Stocks

Short-term Optimism Index (Optix)
NYSE Arms Index
NYSE Up Issues Ratio
S&P 500 Down Pressure
VIX
Inverse ETF Volume
NYSE Up Volume Ratio
% Showing Optimism: 40%
Bearish for Stocks

Smart Money / Dumb Money Confidence Spread
Intermediate Term Optimism Index (Optix)
Smart Money Confidence
Dumb Money Confidence
% Showing Excess Optimism
Risk Appetite Index
Rydex Ratio
Rydex Money Market %
Fidelity Funds Breadth
VIX Term Structure
Equity Put/Call Ratio
OEX Put/Call Ratio
SKEW Index
Options Speculation Index
AIM (Advisor and Investor Model)
Equity Hedging Index
LOBO Put/Call Ratio
ROBO Put/Call Ratio
NAAIM Exposure Index
AAII Bull Ratio
AAII Allocation - Stocks
NYSE Available Cash
Retail Money Market Ratio
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio
Mutual Fund Cash Level

Portfolio

PositionDescriptionWeight %Added / ReducedDate
StocksRSP4.9Reduced 4%2021-02-09
Bonds30.0% BND, 8.8% SCHP38.8Added 15.1%2021-02-18
CommoditiesGCC2.3Reduced 2.1%
2020-09-04
Precious MetalsGDX9.0Added 0.1%2021-02-18
Special Situations7.3% XLE, 4.8% PSCE12.1Reduced 5.6%2021-02-18
Cash32.8
Updates (Changes made today are underlined)

With a market that has seen the kinds of broad participation and big breath thrusts like we did in the fall, it's hard to become too negative. Those kinds of conditions have consistently preceded higher returns over the next 6-12 months.

It's the interim that's more of an issue. Even conditions like that haven't prevented some shorter-term pullbacks. And when we combine an environment where speculation is rampant and recent days have seen an increase in cracks under the surface of the indexes, it's enough to become more defensive over a short- to medium-term time frame. We still don't have much confirmation from the price action in the indexes, so those who are more conservative would likely wait before increasing cash levels.

I've decreased risk exposure a bit more, mainly in terms of energy stocks and the ANGL fund, while adding more to the broader bond market.

RETURN YTD:  5.4%

2020: 8.1%, 2019: 12.6%, 2018: 0.6%, 2017: 3.8%, 2016: 17.1%, 2015: 9.2%, 2014: 14.5%, 2013: 2.2%, 2012: 10.8%, 2011: 16.5%, 2010: 15.3%, 2009: 23.9%, 2008: 16.2%, 2007: 7.8%

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.