Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

What I'm looking at - TLT Optix, Leading vs. Coincident, Russell range, DAX breadth, REITs, Smart Money Index

Troy Bombardia
2019-10-22
null

Here's what I'm looking at:


TLT

With bonds pulling back, TLT's Optix is trending downwards. Its 5 day average is now below 22:

While it's easy to assume that this is bullish for bonds, it hasn't always been the case. The following demonstrates what happened next to TLT when Optix's 5 day average fell below 22, while TLT was in an uptrend (above its 200 dma):

Treasury bonds typically fell over the next 2 months.


Leading vs Coincident Indicators

One final word about the Conference Board's set of indicators. (If you haven't already, see Jason's daily report on the LEI). Bespoke noted that that ratio between the Conference Board's Leading Economic Indicators vs. Coincident Economic Indicators has fallen to a 16 month low:

This is a concept I first came across in Ed Yardeni's autobiography, which suggested that this ratio is a useful leading indicator since it tends to roll over before recessions begin:

While this assertion is true, there are also plenty of false bearish signals (e.g. 1995) or bearish signals that were too early (e.g. April 2006, August 1998). The following chart demonstrates what happened next to the S&P when this ratio fell to a 16 month low (excluding overlaps):

Some late-cycle cases were immediately preceded by large losses over the next 6 months (e.g. 1966, 1969, 1973), and other cases were followed by another 1-2 year rally.


Small caps

Small caps continue to trend sideways in a relatively tight range.

Long, tight ranges are usually followed by a breakout on the upside. The following table illustrates what happened next to the Russell when it's 9 month range (max/min) fell below 12%:

As you can see, the Russell's returns over the next 6 months are mostly bullish, with one bearish case. The following table looks at what the S&P did next:


DAX's improving breadth

Outside of the U.S., various countries' stock indices are breaking out (e.g. Japan and Germany). With German stocks breaking out, the % of DAX members above their 200 dma has climbed above 76% for the first time in almost 2 years:

As you can see, this streak of "weak breadth + breakout" mirrors the 2001-2002 and 2007-2009 bear markets. If we loosen the parameters and examine every case in which weak breadth ended after 100+ days, the DAX's forward returns over the next 6-12 months were quite bullish, even if it faced short term pullbacks.


REITs

As Tiho noted, REITs are on fire this year (no doubt helped by falling interest rates). While REITs have been grinding upwards nonstop, yesterday was the first time since February in which RWR's 14 day RSI exceeded 70.

*RWR = REIT ETF

When RWR's 14 day RSI exceeded 70 for the first time in more than 150 days, it typically experienced weakness over the next 2-4 weeks, but went higher over the next 6 months:

If we loosen the parameters to include cases in which RSI exceeded 70 for the first time in 100+ days, the results are similar. Forward returns are weak over the next 2-4 weeks, but strong over the next 6 months.

October 2007 was a clear bearish outlier, and that outlier can be easily explained away. Activity leads prices in real estate, and real estate activity (New Home Sales, Housing Starts, Building Permits) had already collapsed by late-2007. The opposite is true today, with real estate activity trending sideways/upwards.

Real estate tends to hold up better than stocks during a recession, and I don't think "the next one" will be similar to 2008. In my opinion, I think the next bear market will be severe, but the recession will be mild. But then again, I'm not fond of making big long term predictions. When you add up the successes + failures, most 3-10 year predictions turn out to be no better than a 50/50 coin toss.


Smart Money Flow Index

The Smart Money Flow Index (or Smart Money Index) is based on the premise the "smart money" trades at the end of the day while "dumb money" trades at the start of the day. This indicator particularly catches traders' attention when it goes down (headline: SMART MONEY IS SELLING).

Despite its popularity and catchy name, I don't find this indicator to be particularly useful for timing purposes. The premise that "smart money trades at the end of the day" is increasingly not true, due to the popularity of ETFs.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.