Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

What I'm looking at - grind higher, Put/Call, rally's distance, S&P 500 breadth

Troy Bombardia
2020-02-12

Here's what I'm looking at:


Grind higher

Another day, another all-time high. The market's rally continues, reminding me of the phrase "never short a dull market". The S&P 500 has made 36 all-time highs over the past 4 months, a feat that has been only matched 4 other times:

While it's easy to assume that this is short term bearish for stocks, that hasn't usually been the case historically:

Granted, the sample size here is small, so let's relax the parameters and look at cases in which the S&P made 36 one year highs over the past 4 months:

Once again, this wasn't consistently bearish for stocks on any time frame. Eventually there was a pullback, but "eventually" is not very useful in terms of market timing.


Put/Call

Sentiment was extremely optimistic in December and January. After a brief pullback a few weeks ago, the S&P has made new highs and sentiment is extremely optimistic again. The Total Put/Call ratio's 50 dma is almost -13% below its 200 dma:

The few other times this happened, the S&P 500 fell over the next 2 weeks:

Looking at the max drawdowns over the next 2 weeks - 3 months, all of the cases saw at least a -3% pullback from where the S&P is right now:


Rally distance

As several market commentators on Twitter have noted, the NASDAQ's surge has pushed it more than 18% above its 200 dma. This is one of the most extreme readings during this bull market.

When this happened in the past, the NASDAQ 100 often experienced weakness over the next 2 weeks. But beyond that, it was inconsistent as a bearish sign for stocks. The "NASDAQ's distance from its 200 dma" eventually fell, but HOW it fell wasn't consistently bearish:

  1. Sometimes the distance fell with the NASDAQ making a pullback (getting closer to its 200 dma)
  2. Sometimes the distance fell with the NASDAQ's rally slowing down, allowing the 200 dma to catch up.

This wasn't consistently bearish for the S&P 500:


S&P 500 breadth

Speaking of 200 dma's, more than half of the S&P 500's members have been above their 200 dma for approximately 1 year:

All good things come to an end, and long streaks of decent breadth usually saw the S&P experience a pullback over the next month.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.