Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

TradingEdge for Feb 5 - More mania as internals decline

Jason Goepfert
2021-02-05
More signs of a speculative mania, and also more signs that there is weaker participation on this latest jump to new highs in the indexes.

The goal of the Weekly Wrap is to summarize our recent research. Some of it includes premium content (underlined links), but we're highlighting the key focus of the research for all. Sometimes there is a lot to digest, with this summary meant to highlight the highest conviction ideas we discussed. Tags will show any related symbols and time frames related to the research.

STOCKS


We entered the week in the midst of a mania, at least in the options market.

We're once again witnessing record speculative activity among the smallest of traders. The most comprehensive and objective way we can express this is the net premiums spent on calls minus premiums spent on puts relative to the total market cap of U.S. stocks. It's a tiny fraction, but that's ignoring all the knock-on effects that call buying has on the underlying market. And once again, this is at a record high. 

Someone has to take the other side of these long call options by selling them, and they hedge their exposure by buying the underlying stock. Their sensitivity to this exposure is estimated by Gamma Exposure. As a percentage of the market cap of all U.S. stocks, it has now been elevated for 50 days and is nearing a record. 

Jay pointed out that sentiment has been extreme enough, for long enough, that the 200-day average of Dumb Money Confidence is nearing the highest level ever.

The chart below displays the S&P 500 Index with Dumb Money Confidence and its own 200-day moving average. Highlighted in red are those occasions when the 200-day moving average itself exceeded 0.67. It is presently flashing a warning sign. 

The big topic over the past week has been short interest. By the sounds of mainstream media, there's a massive build-up of shares that greedy hedge funds have borrowed and sold, hoping to buy them back later at a lower price. Yet the median stock in the S&P 500 has only 1.6% of its float sold short, the lowest amount since 2001. 

The average stock across the S&P, Dow Industrials, Nasdaq 100, and Russell 2000 has just over 2% of its float sold short, a 17-year low. 

As companies emerge from the chaos of last spring, many of them are still losing money. More than 7% of firms within the S&P 500 are showing negative operating earnings over the past 12 months, the highest percentage in over a decade. Among companies in the Russell 2000, nearly 35% of them have not turned a profit, even as the index itself skyrocketed to one of its best rallies since its inception. 

So, we have a situation with the most money-losing companies in a decade, with a market accepting of the lowest-quality issues ever, and a decades-low number of skeptical investors.

It's interesting that implied volatility is plunging after the surge last week. The VIX dropped more than 8.5% now on back-to-back days, even though it's still hanging above 25. Theoretically, this is supposed to be positive, but hasn't proven out that way in the past.

Then it did it again on Thursday.

The latest AAII survey showed still-low optimism despite stocks roaring back to new highs. That's not necessarily a good thing, either.

Selling pressure in the last hour of trading has been very negative of late. Dean created a  trend following model for the last hour of trading. The model uses a cumulative advance-decline line based upon whether the last hour of trading was up or down. 

A new sell signal triggered last Friday. The last hour of trading most days this week hasn't been impressive, either.

Still, the internal environment is still mostly healthy. Despite some oddities and concerns leading up to this week, most of the measures we look at aren't yet signaling the kind of deterioration seen at other major peaks. It doesn't have to happen, it just usually does following an extreme in sentiment as we've seen.

The S&P 500 suffered a key reversal last week and lost its 50-day moving average. But more than 40% of stocks still managed to hold above their own averages. During unhealthy environments, we consistently see fewer than 40% of stocks above their averages, and moves above 60% tend to bring sellers in quickly. So far, this still looks healthy. 

The mostly good market has allowed investors to focus on the individual merits of their stocks, so the correlation among them has plunged to an extremely low level. This has preceded weak 3-6 month returns, especially in some of the higher-risk factors.

Dean and I have been semi-obsessively checking for signs of internal deterioration for over a month. Following a speculative extreme like we've seen since November, internal divergences are usually an excellent heads-up that the excesses are on the cusp of being unwound. 

It's not to the point where it's pound-the-table obvious, but there are certainly more signs now than before. The S&P 500 moved to a record high, but fewer than 5% of its member stocks also hit a high on Thursday. And fewer than 70% of them have even made it above their 50-day moving averages. 

This kind of move has been decidedly negative for forward returns.

Jay discussed in-depth a way to capitalize on the idea that upside in stocks might be capped in the coming month(s), in case all these sentiment extremes finally do start to matter, and the environment deteriorates.

The strategy is known as a "bear put spread", which involves buying one put option at a higher strike price and selling another put option at a lower strike price. If we want to be able to make money on even a small decline in the price of the underlying security, we will use the following guidelines:

  • Option expiration with at least 30 days left until expiration (so that we can hold the trade for a month)
  • Buy a put with a delta close to -60
  • Sell a put with a delta close to -30

Delta is the option Greek that tells us roughly the stock equivalent position. In other words, buying a put option with a delta of -60 gives you roughly the same expected profit and loss of shorting 60 shares of the underlying security.

Buying a -60 delta gives us an "in-the-money" position (a put option is considered "in-the-money" if the strike price is above the current price of the underlying security) that can begin to make money quickly if the underlying security declines in price.

Selling a -30 delta does two things for us:

  • The premium received for selling the put helps pay for the -60-delta put that we bought
  • Allows time decay to work in our favor if the underlying security drops below the strike price of the option we bought (rather than work against us if we only bought a put).


COMMODITIES

Whatever the guesses are that retail traders can push a physical commodity market into disequilibrium, they helped to at least squeeze silver higher by one of its largest amounts ever in a single day, measured from previous close to intraday high. 

These have not ended well for the metal.

The long-term uptrend in gold may be teetering on the edge, which has a debatable tendency to lead to more weakness should the 50-day finally cross below the 200-day. When it comes to miners, they've gotten hit hard enough that on an average day over the past 2 weeks, only 20% of them were holding above their 200-day moving averages.

This comes on the heels of a period when more than 85% of them were above their long-term average. Going back as far as we can, this kind of behavior has resulted in rebounds over the next 3 months.

Jay noted that wheat is entering a difficult part of the calendar.

In a piece last week, he noted that February, March, and April are historically a seasonally favorable period for soybeans. For wheat, it is a different story.  Because wheat has an entirely different planting cycle than soybeans and corn, it tends to have its own unique seasonal tendencies. 

The following chart shows the accumulated profit or loss generated over the years. Again, we can see a couple of rip-roaring counter (seasonal) trend rallies. But the long-term trend is unmistakable. 

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.