Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Wednesday Color - Wall Street Pessimism, Utility Surge, Overseas Flow, Copper

Jason Goepfert
2019-09-04
null

Here's what's piquing my interest as stocks bounce back after a lessening of geopolitical tension, for the moment at least.

Sad Street

The WSJ notes that expected forward earnings for the S&P 500 is expected to show barely any growth in the quarters ahead according to Wall Street analysts. That's not really a change, as the S&P's forward earnings has trailed actual earnings for nearly a year.

It turns out that since 1990, that's a long time for Wall Street to underestimate corporate America. At nearly a year, this streak of 50 straight weeks of underestimating earnings ranks as one of the longest.

As we can see by the red dots on the chart, other long streaks generally led to higher returns. Over the next 9 months, there was only a single loss.

The long streak of analysts missing the strength of corporate earnings from a bottom-up perspective has bled into confusion among strategists as well. 

Of the 21 Wall Street strategists tracked by Bloomberg, there is a 176 point standard deviation among their year-end price estimates for the S&P 500. That's the highest in at least 20 years.

It's interesting to note that prior to this year, the most confusion was in 2001. Markets were stumbling, cracked after the 9/11 tragedy but then rallied into year-end.

The year they were the most confident (lowest standard deviation) was 2007, the year the bull market ended. We don't have enough to suggest this is a solid edge, but such confusion among the Wall Street bank crowd should be a good sign.

Sectors

A jump in some defensive sectors on Tuesday benefited utilities, with many of those stocks jumping. More than half of them managed to pop outside of their upper volatility bands, and as we have often seen with defensive sectors, bouts of extreme momentum tend to lead to poor shorter-term returns.

The buying pressure was enough to push nearly 80% of the stocks to their highest price in the past month.

Even more impressively, nearly 60% of them also hit 52-week highs. This sector has not been very successful at holding this kind of widespread momentum.

The Optimism Index for XLU jumped above 90, again something that has preceded weak returns.

Especially when looking at the past 10 years.

Overseas Flow

We've looked at this several times in recent weeks, and it just keeps getting more extreme. According to the Investment Company Institute, investors continue to leave overseas equities. U.S. equities, too, but especially overseas. Almost every week over the past 6 months has seen an outflow (including both mutual funds and ETFs), now totaling nearly $50 billion. 

The only period that can match this was the collapse into the fall of 2008.

We can see the persistence of the outflows by summing how many weeks in the past 6 months had an inflow. Right now, there have only been 3 weeks with inflows out of the past 26.

Metal Mush

Copper still can't catch a sustained bid, and it's again the most-hated commodity.

An Optimism Index below 19 hasn't happened too many times before, and returns going forward weren't all that impressive, even though the only other time in the past 17 years that it got this low, the metal soon bottomed and went on a multi-year tear.

Zooming in on the 1990s through early 2000s, most of the other periods of heavy pessimism did ultimately lead to any further shorter-term losses being erased during a subsequent rally, but the timing was inconsistent, making it hard to trade especially when having to use futures contracts.

It doesn't have good seasonality right now, either.

Hedgers are holding more than 21% of open interest net long, the most since 2016, but that hasn't been enough to turn many of the prior downtrends. Its 6-12 month returns were impressive, but inconsistent.

About the most positive aspect to this is that hedgers are also heavily short gold, and when that's happened, copper has done much better, especially relative to gold.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.