Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Volatility is slowly easing

Jason Goepfert
2020-03-31
A simulated model of the VIX that goes back 60 years shows that volatility expectations are slowly easing. This SimVIX model just fell to a 5-day low after a near-record spike, which has preceded some short-term weakness in stocks, but longer-term strength.

Volatility in March has been high, which is not news to anyone. In some of the studies we looked at, like the percentage gaps at the open of trading, volatility has never been higher.

When thinking about volatility, most people gravitate toward the VIX "fear gauge." It's a handy measure for sure, but only goes back to 1990, or 1986 if we use the old calculation.

In the past, we've looked at a simulated VIX indicator that uses several different models to recreate what the VIX might have done if it existed at the time. Over the past couple of decades, the model has a 90% correlation to the VIX itself, so it's done a good job. Any model will have a hard time with outliers like the Black Monday crash in 1987 and this was no exception.

Any model is imperfect, but they at least give us some idea of what things might have looked like if the options-based creation had more history. For those who enjoy twisting their minds around arcane academic papers, here you go.

This simulated VIX (SimVIX) just peaked above 80%, which was barely eclipsed by a few days in 1987 and 2008.

The key term there might be "peaked." The SimVIX has gone from its highest level in years to a 5-day low as of Tuesday.

A 5-day low might seem insignificant, but when this indicator turns from an extreme, it has tended to keep going longer-term.

For stocks, this typically meant a lot of shorter-term swings, usually to the downside, while hammering out important low points.

The next couple of weeks in the S&P were painful a few times, and in 2002 and 2008, it lasted even longer. But those lower lows didn't last long, and over the next 6-12 months, it was almost all upside.

For volatility itself, it's not a big surprise that these moves rarely led to even higher volatility going forward. Only once, in 1974, did it do an about-face and exceed its prior high.

The past few weeks have seen all kinds of "never seen before" developments, but as far as we can rely on historical behavior, this easing of volatility after such a severe spike should be more good news.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.