Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Tuesday Color - Less Confident, Relative Lows, Bond Optimism, Gold Surge

Jason Goepfert
2019-06-25
null

Here's what's piquing my interest on a mostly weak day. Markets are likely going to be held to the latest posturings and headlines ahead of and during the upcoming G-20 meeting.

Less Confident

The latest Consumer Confidence survey came in way below economists' expectations, which won't help the surprise indexes any. It was one of the largest misses since 2000.

Whether this is a bad thing is debatable. Other big misses in the survey led to a higher S&P 500 over the next month 73% of the time.

Relative Lows

Most of the major stock indexes have pushed to new highs, and overall breadth figures have been good - both the S&P 500 and NYSE A/D Line have hit new highs in recent days.

That doesn't mean all areas have been going along for the ride, and it's become more of a concern. Both the WSJ and Bloomberg note that small-caps, transportation stocks, and banks have been lagging the market badly.

Relative to the S&P, small-caps just hit a new low, within days of the S&P hitting a high.

So did transports.

And banks.

The only reason for using the Nasdaq Bank index as opposed to a more popular index like the BKX is more history. They have a very high correlation.

Whenever the S&P 500 recently hit a 52-week high and 1 of the 3 indexes hit a 52-week low, it didn't necessarily augur trouble.

When at least 2 of the 3 indexes hit a relative low, though, it was more cause for concern. At some point within the next 6 months, 4 of the 7 signals saw the S&P drop more than 19%.

Here's the real kicker, though. This is only the 3rd time ever that all 3 indexes hit a relative low soon after a new high in the S&P itself. And both of the other two were...not good.

We've looked at relative strength between the S&P and broad sectors or assets many times in the past, and it's often an effective guide. When one area of the market is lagging badly, it usually hasn't necessarily led to trouble. We saw that again in the first table above. But when it's spread across more and more areas, the danger level increases.

It's hard to square this with the new high in the A/D Line, which has positive implications. Like we saw within the S&P 500 itself, this is a different kind of "split" market that we haven't really seen many, if any, times before. While it's questionable to say it's a definite negative, this look today is worrying.

Bond Optimism

Sentiment on bonds continues to hold steady near extreme territory. The Optimism Index has been hovering near 70% for a month now. In the past 5 years, only the spring of 2016 can match it.

Since 1991, there have been a few periods with such elevated and prolonged optimism, and while Treasuries managed to build on their gains a couple of times, it was a tough slog overall.

Most of us don't trade 10-year T-note futures, so using a more popular proxy, the TLT fund, returns were still weak.

Other parts of the bond market, like corporates, did much better than Treasuries when sentiment was at this kind of extreme.

All Aboard

It's kind of odd that panic-type assets like gold and bitcoin are showing such high optimism even while stocks hover near their highs.

Adding to the evidence that gold bugs have to hope "this time is different," the Optimism Index on GLD has averaged greater than 92% over the past three sessions. That hasn't happened since 2016.

Since the fund's inception, it has really struggled to hold its gains over the next 1-2 weeks in particular.

Optimism on the gold miners has also spiked.

The interesting thing here, though, is that while they really struggled short-term, longer-term they tended to rally. That's saying something for a sector that has performed so poorly for so long.

Most of these signals clustered in early 2009 and mid 2016 when they were going on a nice run, so bulls should hope that after a brief respite, we get another round of buying enthusiasm like those periods.

Hedging Activity

Over the past year, ETF traders have used inverse funds to protect against potential downside. When volume in these funds spike, it shows high concern about a decline, and has been a good contrary indicator.

In recent days, Monday in particular, they've not found the need for so much protection. Volume in inverse ETFs dropped below 0.25% of all volume. Over the past year, this has been a mild warning sign.

It's important to note that prior to the last year, readings below this level were common, and not a negative. So if we're heading back into an environment of generally less risk, then we'll likely continue to see inverse ETF volume levels at its current pace or below.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.