Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

The Stock Replacement Strategy with Ticker XLF

Jay Kaeppel
2021-08-12
This piece compares buying shares of a particular ETF versus buying a deep-in-the-money call option and compares the potential expected relative risks and rewards.

In this piece, Dean wrote about a variety of signals involving the financial sector. A common vehicle for trading in the financial sector is ticker XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund). 

One that caught my eye involved the following simple setup.

What really caught my eye was the 82% Win Rate over the 2 weeks following previous signals.

This represents a good opportunity to highlight something commonly referred to as the "Stock Replacement Strategy." 

BUYING SHARES OF XLF

As always, what follows is intended as an educational example and not as specific trade "recommendations." 

The underlying theory is that we have a bullish indication for ticker XLF over the next two weeks. The most straightforward approach to acting on this would be to buy 100 shares of ticker XLF. As you can see in the screenshot and risk curve chart below (courtesy of Optionsanalysis) - as this is written - buying 100 shares of XLF would cost $3,868. For each $1 in price that XLF shares rise or fall, this trade will make $100.

STOCK REPLACEMENT STRATEGY WITH XLF OPTIONS

The advantage of buying shares of XLF is that a trader can hold them beyond the two-week "favorable" period if desired. But for our purposes, we are assuming that we are focusing strictly upon generating a profit if XLF advances by some amount over the next two weeks.

This is a situation where it can make great sense to buy a deep-in-the-money call option instead of the shares of the underlying security (XLF in this case) itself. Consider the following example trade:

  • Buy XLF Aug27 36 calls @ $2.74 

The particulars appear in the screenshot below and the risk curves below that.

Things to note:

  • The cost to enter this trade is only $274 (instead of $3,868 to buy 100 shares of XLF)
  • The breakeven price on this trade is $38.74 (there is minimal time premium built into this option)
  • The option has a "delta" of 94.06 (this means that it will behave similarly to a position of buying 94 shares of XLF but at a fraction of the cost)
  • If XLF rallies above the breakeven of $38.74, this option will profit point-for-point with XLF shares
  • If XLF falls apart and declines substantially, the worst case is a loss of $274

The chart below overlays the two positions (long 100 shares vs. long 1 Aug27 36 call).

  • Above $36 a share for XLF, the option trade will behave just like the long stock position (minus the $6 in time premium paid when buying the option)
  • Below $36 a share for XLF, the stock position will continue to lose money, while the option can lose no more than $274

Consider:

If XLF were to rally 3% in the next two weeks (not a prediction, just a random number to use for illustrative purposes):

  • Ticker XLF would rise from $38.68 a share to $39.84 a share
  • Buying 100 shares of XLF at $38.68 would yield a profit of $116 (39.84-38.68 times 100 shares), or 3% on an investment and risk of $3,868
  • Buying 1 36 strike price call option would yield a profit of $110 (stock price of 39.84 minus strike price of 36.00 minus price paid of 2.74 times 100 shares), or 40% on an investment ad risk of $274

Now let's say the unthinkable happens and XLF fall completely out of bed and collapses 15% in two weeks:

  • Ticker XLF would fall from $38.68 a share to $32.88 a share
  • Buying 100 shares of XLF at $38.68 would yield a loss of -$580 (32.88-38.68 times 100 shares), or -15% on an investment and risk of $3,868
  • Buying 1 36 strike price call option would yield a loss of the entire $274 premium paid to buy the call option

SUMMARY

  • Will XLF rally in the next two weeks? I can't say for sure.
  • Is the "Stock Replacement Strategy" always a better alternative? Not necessarily.
  • Which will prove to be the better trade two weeks from now - buying 100 shares of XLF, buying an in-the-money call option? Or taking no trade at all? Again, I can't say for sure.

But remember, the purpose of this piece is not to convince you to do something - or to not do something - with regards to ticker XLF. 

The purpose is to alert you to a potentially cheaper alternative to buying shares in some circumstances that can offer:

  • A lower cost of entry
  • Similar profit potential
  • Less downside risk

Ultimately, it may not be your "cup of tea." But if you are a trader, it is probably at least worth knowing about.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.