Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

The right sectors aren't leading us out of the bottom

Jason Goepfert
2020-04-22
If we take a detailed look at sector leadership heading into the market peak and subsequent bounce, the "right" sectors aren't leading.

One of the ways to see if the rebound is sustainable is to look at the sectors leading out of the decline. Through the first week, it wasn't very encouraging, since the sectors that typically lead out of true bottoms weren't leading then.

A concern popping up now is noted by the Wall Street Journal:

“In past bear markets, you tend to have a change in leadership—the stocks that led you into a bear market weren’t the kinds that led you out,” [Mr. Larson] said.

This has been a common refrain. Because big tech stocks did so well leading up to the peak, and several of them have done so well lately, then it suggests we haven't really seen the kind of rotation that marks the end of bear markets.

Let's look at "false" bottoms. These are times when the S&P 500 hit a 52-week low, rebounded for at least 20 days, then fell to a lower low at some point in the following months.

Below, we can see the percentage of time each sector was among the top 3 performers during the year preceding a peak. We can compare that to the percentage of time each sector was in the top 3 in the 20 days following major lows that didn't see a lower low within the next year.

In the year leading up to the peak before a bear market, defensive sectors had a strong tendency to be leaders. When stocks bounced during failed rally attempts, there was a lot of variance between sectors. Tech and financials tended to lead out of the lows, but other sectors were more represented than during "true" bottoms. 

The kind of sector leadership we've seen over the past 20 days is more like "false" bottoms than "true" bottoms, but it's not a huge edge. Overall, the idea that sector leadership should rotate when coming out of a bear market is not supported by evidence going back to 1928.


This is an abridged version of our recent reports and notes. For immediate access with no obligation, sign up for a 30-day free trial now.

We also looked at:

  • A much more in-depth look at true vs false bottoms and the kinds of leadership we tend to see
  • The ZEW survey of German confidence is showing present fear and future hope, and what that means
  • The McClellan Oscillator shows that breadth momentum is turning negative
  • The Nasdaq fell hard on Tuesday, but breadth wasn't too bad
  • Gold optimism is high and the gold/oil ratio has gone parabolic
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.