Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

The Post-Election Year Dead Zone - Part II

Jay Kaeppel
2021-07-30
In Part II, we take a closer look at stock market performance across various sectors and styles during the 3-month "Post Election Year Dead Zone" months of August through October.

In this article, I demonstrated that the 3-month period of August, September, and October of post-election years constitutes a "dead zone" for the stock market.  Let's take a closer look at market performance during this period compared to typical market performance.

NOTE: For the sake of brevity, from here out, we will refer to this 3-month period as "PEDZ" (Post-Election Dead Zone).

SECTORS AND STYLES

For "Sectors" and "Styles," we will use the 11 S&P 500 Industry Sectors and the 6 S&P 500 Styles since 1990. Before that, we use the Fama French Data set, which includes a wider universe of stocks.

ALL SECTORS COMBINED AND STYLES COMBINED

The table below displays:

  • The average 3-month return for all 11 sectors (in the "Sectors" column)
  • The average 3-month return for all 6 styles (in the "Styles" column) 
  • ONLY during August through October of each post-election year starting in 1929

SECTORS AND STYLES INDIVIDUALLY

Now let's look at the performance of each sector and style individually. The table below displays the cumulative total return achieved for each sector or style held ONLY during August through October during post-election years starting in 1929. Performance is broken down into the 3 time periods highlighted above (i.e., 1929 through 1941, 1945 through 1949, and 1953 to present).

THE PEDZ VERSUS ALL 3-MONTH ROLLING PERIODS

To get a sense of just how inferior PEDZ performance has been, next we will:

  • Compare performance during this particular 3-month period
  • To the average performance across ALL 3-month rolling periods

The table below displays:

  • The average 3-month % gain or loss across all rolling 3-month periods starting in 1929
  • The average 3-month % gain or loss across all "Post-Election August through October" periods since 1929
  • The % times a 3-month gain was shown across all rolling 3-month periods starting in 1929
  • The % times a 3-month gain was shown across all "Post-Election August through October" periods since 1929

SUMMARY

The results in the tables above demonstrate that over time stocks have performed well below average during our 3-month Post-Election Dead Zone. But the question on investor's minds is more along the lines of "What about 2021?" Will any of this matter a wit in 2021? The reality is that there is no way to predict. There have been post-election years where stocks have performed just fine during the "dead zone."  

But given that the stock market has had little more than a minor pullback so far in 2021, investors should recognize that if trouble is going to come to the market this year, history suggests that the impending three months is as likely a time as any.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.