Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

The Nasdaq Is Split, Again

Jason Goepfert
2021-08-17
As the Nasdaq Composite hangs near a 52-week high, there has been a lot of internal turmoil. Its Summation Index is deeply negative, with more 52-week lows than highs. That has triggered a cluster of technical warning signs.

On Monday, we saw that despite new highs in many of the major U.S. equity indexes, the old school NYSE Advance/Decline Line hadn't made a fresh high for over two months.

It's worse on the Nasdaq.

On Monday, the Nasdaq Composite closed within 1% of a 52-week high, and yet two long-term measures of breadth on that exchange fell to very low levels. The McClellan Summation Index closed below -350, and the New High / New Low Ratio was below 30%.

Those are the worst figures in history, dating back to 1986, for a day when the Composite was so near a high. It's in stark contrast to the huge positive momentum thrust from November through February.

There are only two dates that come close to the current divergences in those indicators. Both times, the Nasdaq took a short-term tumble, with a poor risk/reward ratio, but both times the Nasdaq also recovered in the months ahead.

Looking at lesser extremes, there was still a tendency to see a short-term shakeout. Every signal since 2007 has led to short-term losses in the Composite.

The fact that there are so many 52-week highs and 52-week lows simultaneously means that the HiLo Logic Index has spiked. The 10-day average moved above 2.5, which the Backtest Engine shows has been a terrible sign during the past 20 years.

Only 4 of the 16 dates showed a positive return over the next two months. Bulls could argue that two of those dates were the most recent ones, which somewhat reduces the bearish argument.

This internal tumult has been triggering some technical warning signs, such as the Hindenburg Omen and Titanic Syndrome for the Nasdaq exchange.

Over the past 30 sessions, a combined 13 signals have been triggered, the most in six years.

When there has been such a cluster of signals with the Composite within spitting distance of a new high, trouble was brewing most of the time. The Nasdaq escaped any damage in 1996, 1999 (for a while), and 2016 but otherwise witnessed high volatility and negative returns.

This year has been one for the record books on several different fronts. It's frustrating that one of those fronts is the number of methods that have failed to precede the kind of price action that they normally do. Sentiment extremes, breadth divergences, price patterns, seasonality - all have gone by the wayside as the creeper trend prevails. 

This happened in 2013-14, which led to a choppy 2015. And it happened in 2017, which led to a rocky 2018. After the speculative blow-off in late January - early February of this year, we've been on the lookout for major deterioration under the surface of the indexes. There have been periodic bouts of that since then, and the indexes have almost immediately recovered. We'll have to see if this is yet another episode.

DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.