Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Signs of the apocalypse

Jason Goepfert
2020-12-04
Stock prices are stretched, overvalued, and investors are overly confident. Warning signs pointed out by money manager John Hussman, and even more of them by Bloomberg, suggest that investors should be worried. Historical reactions were less convincing.

Stock prices are stretched, their valuations are absurd, and investors are all-in.

So notes money manager John Hussman in a recent post outlining the dangers that investors are currently facing. As he states:

"The red bars in the chart below show one of the more extreme syndromes of “overvalued, overbought, overbullish” conditions one can define. The specific conditions are shown in the chart text. The bars with yellow shading show instances where this syndrome has been in place, and the S&P 500 dropped at least 7% over the following month. All of these instances, prior to those of the past few days, are shaded yellow."

The first time in recent years that we discussed Mr. Hussman's work was February 2016, when he was warning of the conditions that precede market crashes. As we saw at the time, those assertions typically did not lead to crashes; stocks rallied most of the time. Same goes for August 2017. And then again in March 2019. As anyone who is familiar with Mr. Hussman's work knows, there is a pattern there.

Regarding his latest warning, the criteria that have preceded big declines include:

  1. The S&P 500 is within 2% of a 52-week high
  2. It is at least 3.5% above its 55-day exponential moving average
  3. Its 14-day Relative Strength Index is > 60%
  4. Its 14-day rate of change is > 5%
  5. Investor's Intelligence survey bulls are > 55%
  6. Investor's Intelligence survey bears are < 30%

We should all be immediately triggered by the use of super-specific conditions and a lot of them. Regardless, if we look objectively at every instance when all of these criteria were met, then we can see the S&P 500's forward returns below.

Certainly, a few of them preceded big declines. These combinations of factors preceded big drops in stocks in 1973, 1987, 2001, 2008, and 2018. But we shouldn't cherry-pick the ones that look ugly on a chart. When we consider all of them together with what we would have known at the time, we would have missed out on more gains than we would have saved by avoiding the relatively few losers. The probability of a big rise across most time frames was about the same as that of a big drop.

An article by Bloomberg sounded some similarly cautious notes. It, too, shows that stocks are overvalued, prices are stretched, and investors are overly confident.

The piece points out 5 potential warning signs:

  1. The S&P 500 is above its monthly Bollinger Band
  2. The put/call ratio is at a 20-year low
  3. Almost all stocks are already in uptrends
  4. Tech stocks are more than 2 standard deviations above trend
  5. The P/E ratio is historically stretched

If we normalize all of these factors, comparing each day's reading with its lifetime range, then we can get a sense of whether these conditions have ever happened before.

From the chart, we can see that this is the 1st time since 1998 when the average of the 5 warning signs was in the top 90% of its lifetime range. Below, we can see that the S&P struggled to hold its gains for the first few months after this moved above 90%.

Stocks did drop after this threshold was first breached, but the losses were pretty minimal. And over the next 6 or 12 months, each of the signals showed a positive return.

If we relax the upper threshold to 80% to generate a larger sample size, then there were still some shorter-term tough spots, but it wasn't as ominous of a medium-term warning.

These conditions didn't lead to the best returns going forward, with below-average results up to 2 months later. From 3 months and beyond, however, the S&P's average returns were well above random, with a decent risk/reward skew.

Conditions like we're seeing now should be worrisome to new, or particularly aggressive, investors. Forward returns have a tendency to be muted, with further short-term gains likely to be erased at some point in the following months. A few of them have even morphed into honest-to-goodness bear markets. But it's not nearly as consistent as the loudest voices tend to assert - the most common outcome is mediocre returns accompanied by choppy market conditions. Perhaps a warning, yes, but not a sell signal.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.