Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Options traders once again set speculative records

Jason Goepfert
2021-01-19
Last week, the smallest of options traders bought a record number of call options. For the first time, that volume exceeded an equivalent of 9% of total NYSE volume. That has raised the risk that dealers will have a lot of inventory to sell, with high Gamma Exposure.

In late August and early September, we focused heavily on the actions of options traders, because it seemed to represent a clear and present danger. While markets as a whole held up okay in the aftermath, there were pockets of heavy losses, 10% or more.

We've touched on it several times in recent weeks as traders became more emboldened with so many stocks hitting new highs. Who's to blame them, since it keeps working?

Combined with other spikes in speculative activity, the action of these traders seems to once again be triggering a sense of imminent danger.

Last week, the smallest of options traders, those trading 10 contracts or fewer, picked up their call buying. In a more drastic change, they also pulled back on their protective put purchases, which fell from 18% of their total volume down to 15%, the lowest in a decade.

This one-two punch caused the ROBO Put/Call Ratio to its lowest level since the bubble years. ROBO stands for Retail-Only, Buy-to-Open, and this is important because unlike other put/call ratios, with this one we know who is doing what. And it tells us that small traders have become wildly speculative.

When we look at the raw number of contracts that small traders are buying, it's astounding. Parabolic is the only accurate term, with more than 22 million call options bought last week.

A reasonable person would suggest, "Well, maybe they bought a lot of put options, too." That would make sense, as overall volumes have risen. If they bought a lot of puts as a hedge, then it would suggest less outright optimism.

It wasn't the case, though. Against those 22.2 million call options, they bought to open only 6.5 million puts. So, the net difference is even more extreme.

Just as troubling, this activity has become more and more of a factor. If we adjust the options volume to account for an equivalent number of shares, then we can get a rough comparison to overall market volume.

For the first time, the activity of these small traders was the equivalent of more than 9% of NYSE volume, exceeding even what we saw at the end of August.

Because the cost of options has come down quite a bit since then, premiums are smaller. So even though the number of transactions is higher, the actual, real-money cost of them has come down somewhat. As a percentage of the market capitalization of all U.S. listed stocks, the amount of money that small traders have laid out for these call options isn't quite as extreme as August.

We focus so heavily on small traders because they tend to be the most consistent contrary indicator at extremes, and because they've become such a driving force, particularly in the options market. The buying of call options from the smallest of traders remains near the highest levels ever as a proportion of all option volume.

And the premiums they're spending on those calls remain among the highest ever in terms of total money spent on all options activity.

If we broaden the universe and include all trades for fewer than 50 contracts, then we can get a more comprehensive view of just how much retail speculation is out there. This is a more conservative look than we did in September, assuming no adjustment for the leverage of the options and using a broader measure of the market cap of stocks.

Again, because implied volatility has come down since the fall, options prices are generally cheaper across the board, so the relative value of total money outlaid is less extreme but is still beyond any other bout of speculation in the prior 20 years.

We've pointed out recently that all of this activity has been raising the potential inventory that dealers will need to sell. After all, somebody is on the other side of all this call buying, and they need to hedge that activity. When the options expire, those hedges get unwound (see this post from a few months ago).

Over the past 20 days, Gamma Exposure has reached a near-record, on an absolute and relative basis.

We've been surprised before, and we'll be surprised again. Maybe this kind of activity will simply result in a wonderful waterfall of profits to all the new, and newly aggressive, options traders. And penny stock traders. And margined investors. From a personal point of view, it would be a thrill to see. It's just that experience and an appreciation of market history shows that when traders press so hard, the market has a very consistent tendency to press back in the opposite direction.

DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.