No Bank Failures; Battle Of Time Frames For Moving Averages
-
Jason Goepfert
Published: 2019-01-14 at 11:52:06 CST
This is an abridged version of our Daily Report.
As good as it can get
Last year, there were no bank failures. That sounds like a good thing, and it’s happened only 3 other times in 85 years.
A sample size of 3 makes it difficult to consider the precedents, so if we relax the parameters and look for years when there were 3 or fewer bank failures, then we see that stocks did fine afterward, so there was no consistent suggestion that few failures necessarily bred trouble going forward. But returns were less than an any-time, random return across almost all time frames for the S&P 500 and Financials in particular. Returns following years with a high number of failures were much better.
Battle of time frames
More than 90% of S&P 500 stocks are in short-term uptrends, while more than two thirds are still in long-term downtrends.
It is rare to see to this degree, and was a long-term positive. Sectors like Financials, Industrials, and Energy are seeing the same thing, with mostly good returns except for in Energy, which struggled mightily.
Earnings issues?
There have been 16 times when Q4 earnings reporting season began with the S&P 500 below its 200-day average. Of those 16, only 5 managed to rally during the season (about 27 days on average), for a 31% win rate, and an average return of -0.4%.
Slow drift
SPY closed at its highest price in a month on the lowest volume in a month. While below the 200-day average, it added to its gains over the next 3 days 5 out of 15 times, averaging -0.3%.
Reminder: The CoT data is still delayed due to the gov’t shutdown.
Related Posts:
- Technical warnings on par with prior peaks
- Weekly Wrap for Jan 14 - Surge in defensive sectors and value stocks, Energy surge, dollar drop
- Four reasons not to give up on tech just yet
- Internal momentum has surged in defensive sectors
- The McClellan Summation Index for defensive sectors nears a record
Tagged As:
The post titled No Bank Failures; Battle Of Time Frames For Moving Averages was originally published as on SentimenTrader.com on 2019-01-14.
At SentimenTrader.com, our service is not focused on market timing per se, but rather risk management. That may be a distinction without a difference, but it's how we approach the markets. We study signs that suggest it is time to raise or lower market exposure as a function of risk relative to probable reward. It is all about risk-adjusted expectations given existing evidence. Learn more about our service , research, models and indicators.
Follow us on Twitter for up to the minute analysis of market action.
Follow @sentimentraderNot ready to signup up for a free trial yet?
Signup for our Daily Lite email to receive highlights of our daily report, research and studies.
Follow us on Twitter:
Follow @sentimentraderSubscribe to our Youtube Channel:
RSS Feed
Subscribe to the Blog RSS feedTags
Recent Blog Posts
Brought to you by:
>