Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

NASDAQ's momentum is weakening?

Troy Bombardia
2020-08-11
The NASDAQ's momentum was incredibly strong, and now looks like it could be weakening.

The NASDAQ's momentum was incredibly strong, and now looks like it could be weakening. As Helene Meisler and Urban Carmel alluded to, previously weaker sectors like the Dow Jones Industrial Average are catching up while previously stronger sectors like the NASDAQ 100 could be weakening. Is this a sign that the market's rally is over, considering that previous leaders could be losing steam?

When this happened in the past, this wasn't a consistently bearish factor for the NASDAQ on any time frame, particularly in the short term.

Likewise, it wasn't consistently bearish for the Dow past 1 week later:

Sectors like consumer staples are catching up and are now within 2% of its prior all-time high:

When this happened in the past, consumer staples usually pushed higher over the next 1-3 months:

The past few months have been a battle between contrarian (calling for the market to drop) vs. momentum (calling for the rally to continue). Thusfar, momentum has won out.

I was talking to one of the best traders I know, and we were discussing that from 2017-present, trend following traders as a group seem to have done better than contrarian traders. More importantly, we were talking about why this is, and some structural changes that have caused this shift. Only when you think about and understand these shifts can you improve your trading.

The market from 2017-present can be described by 1 simple phrase: extreme has become more extreme.

Short term and medium term moves are becoming more and more one directional without the ebb and flow that was so common from 2000-2016. This could be the reason why so many historical comparisons have not been too accurate

  1. Stocks went straight up in 2017. 
  2. Stocks crashed pretty quickly in Q4 2018.
  3. Stocks went straight back up in early-2019. So many people called for a pullback, because "V bottoms are historically rare". The market didn't care, and it went straight back up without a retest of the bottom.
  4. Stocks rallied like crazy in late-2019 and early-2020. So many bears started calling the top from November - February.
  5. Stocks crashed in 1 straight line in February/March 2020. "Historically, the market crashed in waves". Now, the market went straight down.
  6. Stocks rallied in 1 straight line since March. This isn't "historically normal", but that's what happened. Tech stocks have witnessed INSANE momentum.
  7. This sort of craziness is not only confined to stocks. Look at gold and silver's rally. Silver tripled in a matter of months.

The bottomline is that from 2017-present, many historical short term extremes have become even more extreme. In my opinion this is the reason why many contrarian traders haven't done that well, whereas many short term trend followers have done well. I've seen arrogant social media personalities call the top from November 2019 - February 2020. Then when the market fell -8%, started calling for a bottom, only for the S&P to drop another -25%. These people will tell you just how right they were at the top and bottom, but when you look at their track record as a whole, has been no better than flipping a coin.

So what is causing this phenomenon of extremes becoming more extreme? No one knows for sure, but I do have some thoughts.

The world as a whole has become more extreme, and the internet (media, social media) has a huge role in this. Whether its politics or financial markets, the middle ground has become increasingly empty. The internet has proliferated wide spread echo chambers that do nothing except pound home on an existing trends and push these trends to even more extremes.

Politics is clear - we're at one of the most turbulent political periods since WWII, and plenty of studies have shown the polarization of peoples' political views.

You see this in markets as well. When 1 trend starts to rise (e.g. gold/silver going up), EVERYONE hops on the bandwagon. Speculators jump in, then Robinhood traders hear about this "once in a lifetime opportunity to 10x your money" from their favorite Youtube guru jump on the trend, and then your neighborhood dentist jumps on the trend too. Because if a kid watching videos on Youtube can 10x his capital, then surely a dentist with years of education should be able to as well.

My point isn't to say that contrarian indicators don't work any more. My point is that you might want to wait a little before you call the end to a trend. If before you would turn bearish when XYZ indicator reached X level, turn bearish when XYZ indicator reaches X+10 nowadays. If before you would turn bullish when XYZ indicator reached Y level, turn bullish when XYZ indicator reaches Y-10 nowadays. Otherwise, there's no point in calling a top for 4 months and calling a bottom when the S&P falls -5%, -10%, -15%, -20%, -25%, -30%. That doesn't do justice to your portfolio.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.