Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Monday Color - New Highs, Material Gain, Financials, Gold, Small Traders, 5 Straight

Jason Goepfert
2019-06-10
null

Here's what's piquing my interest so far today.

High-Light

One of the most notable developments of the rally to end last week was the expanding number of securities that erased their May pullbacks. Nearly 10% of issues on the NYSE reached a 52-week high on Friday, the most since January 2018.

Historically, there have a lot more days with many more issues hitting new highs, but still.

When more than 9% of securities hit a new high, and that's the most in at least a year, future returns were good once we got beyond the first couple of weeks. There were big failures in 1974 and 2000, which hit almost immediately.

We look at the thrusty nature of the rally last week several different ways, with impressive results. When we get that kind of thrust off of at least a 50-day low, the gains tend to stick. Same for the surge in new highs, but the sample size is too tiny and one of them was a failure.

Even though the surge came off a 50-day low and the gains were steady and impressive, the S&P 500 was still more than 2% off its high. That sets up a possible positive divergence, or at least what looks like one on a chart. Divergences are inconsistent things, and tough to use to gauge imminent risk or reward.

The biggest failure in 1973 and '74 came when the S&P was well off its own high. By Friday, the index was within 2.5% of its peak. While that didn't mean the signal was perfect, and there were still some failures like 2000, future returns were still mostly good, especially longer-term.

Breadth Review

The jump was especially impressive in basic material stocks, and more than a quarter of them became overbought by Friday. That has preceded some weaker short-term returns.

The change in momentum was enough to jerk 40% of material stocks outside their upper volatility bands.

It was enough of a push in momentum among those stocks that the McClellan Oscillator jumped above +100.

The recent trend needs to change for that sector, because over the past couple of years it has peaked almost immediately when the Oscillator got this high.

Consumer staples also enjoyed renewed vigor, and more than 35% of them hit a 52-week high. That's the most since 2016. While broad-based buying is assumed to be a universally good sign, there are times when too much of a good thing can be a bad thing, and defensive groups like staples tend to struggle after seeing this kind of buying interest.

Same for utilities, where more than 70% of stocks reached a new high. That has led to a sea of red before.

It was also a good week for financials, where more than a quarter of the stocks hit a new high. That, too, is the most in a year.

For that sector, it has been mostly a very good sign, with an excellent risk/reward ratio over the next year.

Heavy Metal

Like most other assets, gold had a good week last week. Hedgers took advantage, selling a heavy portion of their long position. Their long contracts dropped from more than 37% of all open interest to 27%.

This is their most intense once-week liquidation of longs in more than a year. 

It's also been a little dicey in the short-term for the metal after it enjoyed 8 straight up days. Longer-term, though, it did well.

Buying Stocks

While "smart money" hedgers were selling gold, they were buying stocks, at least some of them. They reduced their net short in the major equity indexes by a large $13 billion. There is still no evidence of them wanting to sell aggressively.

It was especially acute in the Dow Industrials, where they are once again net long. Granted, the last 10 years have been a mostly one-way street, but still, forward returns were very good when hedgers had this much confidence.

Small Traders Aren't

While hedgers were buying stocks, the smallest of options traders were picking up their hedges against it. They spent 25% of their options volume buying protective put options last week, one of the heaviest amounts since the financial crisis.

This has been a very impressive buy signal.

Prior to that, there was some volatility near the ends of the big bear markets.

5 Up

The S&P 500 is on track for its 5th straight gain of more than 0.5% off a 50-day low. Remarkably, this has happened only twice before since 1928, on July 3, 1962, and November 28, 2008, both of which gained more than 22% over the next year...with some volatility.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.