Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Investors extrapolate big gains, with high Confidence

Jason Goepfert
2021-01-04
Investors ended 2020 with some of the biggest confidence for more gains in more than 20 years. Other years that had the most similar path in the S&P 500 tended to see muted gains at best during the first couple months of a new year. Tech and energy stocks saw similar behavior after the most-correlated years.

Even with a rally to close the year at new highs, and a consistently positive December, Dumb Money Confidence dipped from its record high, while Smart Money Confidence increased a bit. Though both measures eased from recent extremes, the protracted difference in sentiment means that we ended the year with one of the lowest spreads since we began calculating this 22 years ago.

Other times when a year ended with a very negative spread, the S&P 500 had a tendency to see a negative return, or a very small positive one, over the next 1-2 months. Out of the 10 years, 7 of them saw a negative return at some point between 1-3 months later. Out of the 3 exceptions, 2004 saw only modest gains, and 2011 saw all the gains erased in the months ahead. Only 2017 was the true exception, with large and sustained gains.

It seems like more and more armchair contrarians are being comforted by the decrease in extreme sentiment. But that's a false comfort - most often, sentiment will reach an extreme peak, and then stocks continue higher for a time, but with less enthusiasm. It's that push higher on less optimism that's the real worry.

Bull markets are most sustainable when optimism is increasing, not decreasing, and we only need to look back to February of last year for a stark example.

Even though sentiment eased a bit in the latter half of December, the spread in Confidence has been negative enough, for long enough, that the 50-day average dropped below -54% for one of only a handful of times since 1998. The Backtest Engine shows that the S&P struggled to hold gains going forward.

When we zoom in on the individual signals, we can see how choppy the price action tended to become soon after these extended extremes.

It's hard to blame investors for having such high confidence. The most-benchmarked index in the world had quite a year, with no other quite like it. Still, there were 20 other years since 1928 that had a correlation of greater than +0.60 (on a scale from -1.0 to +1.0).

Individually, the 10 most recent ones are shown below. The magnitude of the moves last year were extreme, but the general path of the index was fairly close to several of them.

Going forward, those years showed modest positive returns, with a risk about equal to reward for the first two months. There was not a lot of consistency.

Among sectors, we saw the most extreme behavior in tech stocks. There were 15 other years that had a relatively high correlation to 2020, at least in the general path, but not in magnitude. As we saw last week, it's been rare for any sector in more than 90 years to see back-to-back years with 40% gains, and their next-year returns were not impressive.

We can see the 10 most recent years in the thumbnails below.

Going forward, tech stocks struggled during the next month. Risk was higher than reward up to a month later, with about double the chance of seeing a big drop versus a big rise (see this Knowledge Base article for definitions).

Even in non-correlated years, QQQ Seasonality shows modestly negative returns during the first few months of the year. And if the big tech stocks in that fund see similar behavior, they will likely depress the whole sector.

At the other end of the spectrum, energy stocks had the worst year of any sector. The worst stretch of any sector ever, really, so there were no years that had a high positive correlation to 2020. There were 15 of them that showed a correlation above +0.25, which is relatively weak.

Individually, this is what they looked like. The magnitude of the losses in 2020 surpassed any other, so the only ones that qualified showed a modest correlation to the path that 2020 took.

Going forward, energy stocks had some trouble with negative momentum during the first 1-2 months of the new year but most were able to reverse course longer-term.

Investors love to extrapolate, which is why trend following is so popular. And most of the time, it works, as long as one can stick with the strategy during the multiple false starts that trigger during choppy conditions. Based on how investors have typically behaved under conditions like we're seeing now, those types of choppy conditions are more likely than not, raising the risk for trend-following strategies.

DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.