Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Hedge funds haven't been embracing the rally

Jason Goepfert
2022-11-16
Across four different strategies, hedge funds appear to have historically low exposure to stocks. The rolling 50-day beta of hedge fund indexes to the S&P 500 is now net short for one of the very few times over the past 20 years.

Key points:

  • Trend-following hedge funds appear to be net short the stock market
  • Across other strategies, funds also appear to have low exposure to stocks
  • When average exposure has been this low, annualized returns in the S&P 500 were exceptional

It's hard to find a bullish hedge fund

We saw on Tuesday that consumers are depressed about the economy and markets. They're not the only ones - hedge funds have been slow to embrace the rally and appear to carry low exposure to stocks across strategies.

On the website, we track the rolling one-month beta of returns of trend-following Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) to the S&P 500 and other assets. Taking a slightly longer-term view, 50 days instead of 21, fund exposure is historically low at 10% net short.

The S&P 500 has returned an annualized 15.3% when exposure was 10% net short or below, compared to a return of only 0.1% when exposure was on the opposite end of the extreme.

It's not just trend followers. Global macro, equity long-only, and market-neutral funds also have low exposure using this method. The average rolling 50-day beta across these four strategies is now negative, suggesting a net short position.

While funds were short during the worst of the financial crisis, their pessimism didn't pay off most of the time. The S&P 500's annualized return when their exposure was 5% or lower was 16.2%, compared to 4.5% when exposure was 25% or higher.

There was an even greater dispersion between returns when exposure was about in the bottom and top 5% of readings. During the bottom 5% of readings, the S&P's annualized return climbed to 17.8% versus -8.0% when it was 30% or higher.

What the research tells us...

There is never total agreement when looking at a broad swath of indicators, and sentiment is no different. Some of them, like fund flows, are not showing any particular extreme. But most of them are, as detailed in our research over the past couple of months. There hasn't been too much of a change in recent weeks among longer-term series. And a major player, hedge funds, appears to be hesitant to embrace this rally, a bullish tailwind as we head into year-end and the necessity of these funds to report results to investors.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.