Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Growth vs. Value Deviation From Trend Signal

Dean Christians
2021-05-18
Let's conduct a study to assess the potential outcome for growth and value now that the relative ratio indicator has fallen 10% below its 1-year average.

Jason and I have shared several notes in the last few months that have suggested that one should favor value-oriented sectors in a portfolio. Whenever I tilt my portfolio toward a style, factor, or theme, I'm constantly reviewing the latest data to assess if the backdrop has changed.

This past week, the 1-year deviation from the trend for the growth/value relative ratio indicator crossed below -10%. One has to go back almost two decades to find the last reading below this level.

Let's conduct the following study to assess the potential outcome for growth and value now that the ratio has fallen 10% below the 1-year average. While the current signal is coming from one of the highest starting points in history, I will adjust the code to capture more instances. I will use a swing of +10% to -10% to identify signals.

HISTORICAL CHART

HOW THE SIGNALS PERFORMED - GROWTH

Growth returns are somewhat weak, especially in the short term. I would also add that the more recent signals have been unfavorable.

HOW THE SIGNALS PERFORMED - VALUE

The short-term results look weak. I suspect this reflects that value has outperformed of late, and it's taking a break. The intermediate to long-term numbers look better. I would also add that the 2-3 month timeframe returns have been good since 1973.

HOW THE SIGNALS PERFORMED - VALUE VERSUS GROWTH RELATIVE

Value looks good on a relative basis versus growth, especially in the 3-month timeframe.

Let's take the study one step further and identify all instances when the deviation from trend indicator crosses below -10% and then falls further to cross below -20%.

When we isolate instances when the indicator falls below -20%, the study identified six occurrences.

HOW THE SIGNALS PERFORMED - GROWTH

The results for growth look good, with a perfect record in the 2-month timeframe.

HOW THE SIGNALS PERFORMED - VALUE

The results for value look good, with a perfect record in the 2-month timeframe.

HOW THE SIGNALS PERFORMED - VALUE VERSUS GROWTH RELATIVE

A value tilt looks favorable on a 1-year basis except for the 1982 instance.

WHEN TO FAVOR GROWTH OR VALUE

The weight-of-the-evidence continues to favor value-oriented sectors. Until proven otherwise, I would stay the course. 

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.