Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Gold's analogs and its tight correlation with tech stocks

Jason Goepfert
2020-08-18
Gold has had a big run over the past 100 days, and while it seems unusual, there have been about a dozen time periods with a high positive correlation to the past 100 sessions. Those did not fare well for gold's future returns. Less concerning is its tight correlation to tech stocks, which has not been a consistent predictor in the past.

On Monday, we saw that there have been a dozen or so time periods that have been highly correlated to the past 100 days in stocks. Despite what seems like an unprecedented move in other markets like gold, that market, too, has seen other stretches that look similar.

Just as we did with the S&P 500, we can go back to 1975 and look for the 100-day periods in gold that have the highest correlation to the past 100 sessions. When we do that, we get about a dozen stretches that have an extremely tight positive correlation to gold's path since March.

When we average them together, it looks like the following.

We can see just how tightly they tracked what we've seen so far in 2020. For what it's worth, the average peaked within the next couple of weeks.

Below are the most recent occurrences (the dates are from the start of the 100-day analogs).

Not sure what it is about gold, but these 100-day stretches were about the longest it could go before correcting. Once the 100 days passed, gold did not perform well.

The next 1-6 months were wicked for the metal, with poor returns, poor consistency, and even worse risk/reward skew.

As the metal has perked up, some large institutional investors have become concerned that it's overvalued, as much as one can actually value a precious metal. The latest Bank of America Merrill Lynch survey of large fund managers shows that more than 30% of them think the metal has gone too far. While these managers have a mixed track record in other assets, their estimates of gold's value has been pretty good, which should be a worry here.

An interesting thing to watch among miners, given Berkshire's stake that was announced on Friday, is the broader reactions among them. While a few of them took off to the upside on Monday, there were significantly fewer of the stocks hitting new highs.

And more than 40% are still in a correction.

It's way too early to suggest that this is a negative divergence between GDX and its component stocks. It certainly bears watching in the days ahead if strength in only a few stocks like Barrick manage to mask some underlying weakness.

Along with gold, tech stocks have gone pretty much straight up since March.

The 100-day correlation between their daily percentage changes has skyrocketed to among the highest levels in history.

To see if it has meant anything consistent, the tables below show every time when their correlation exceeded +0.25 for the first time in about six months.

This was not a great sign for gold but was not a big edge. It tended to fall back over the next couple of months, with below-average returns. Thanks to many of the signals triggering during the 2000s bull market, the risk/reward was positive, so at least there's that.

Tech stocks mostly shrugged it off. There was no real edge there.

For the broader market, it was a mixed sign as well. The S&P 500's forward returns were about in line with random, with a couple of really bad returns and a few really good ones. There was no consistency.

It's tempting to assign a narrative to the big runup in tech stocks and gold, with the Fed's policies that favorite scapegoat. It's probably true. But the two assets have traveled together before, even tighter than they are now, and it didn't mean anything consistent going forward.

More damning for gold is the fact that other times it enjoyed 100-day stretches like its current one, it almost invariably fell back in the month(s) ahead. We don't place a lot of weight on analogs though it does support the idea of a headwind when coupled with such high optimism as it's been seeing.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.