Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : Metals and bonds give different picture as excess liquidity spikes

Jason Goepfert
2020-09-10
Over the past few months, there has been a breakdown in many long-term relationships, like between the price of copper and the level of 10-year Treasury yields. That's driven in part by a surge in excess liquidity in the system.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


Metals and bonds give different picture as excess liquidity spikes: Over the past few months, there has been a breakdown in many long-term relationships, like between the price of copper and the level of 10-year Treasury yields. That's driven in part by a surge in excess liquidity in the system.

Active managers pull back: A couple of weeks ago, active investment managers were about the most exposed in at least 13 years. That's not a great contrary indicator, though it has often suggested that higher-beta stocks are more at risk. This week, their exposure dropped more than 30% yet still remains above 50%. That was a good buy-the-dip sign in March 2007 and August 2019, otherwise not so much.

Bottom Line:

  • Weight of the evidence has been suggesting flat/lower stock prices short- to medium-term, that will moderate with recent weakness; still suggesting higher prices long-term
  • Dumb Money Confidence was recently above 80% with evidence of skyrocketing speculation which increased during a down week, typically a bad sign when combined with an unhealthy environment, though that's turning more neutral, and failures were approaching record length
  • Active Studies show a heavy positive skew over the longer-term mostly thanks to the March/April/May breadth thrusts, recoveries, and trend changes
  • Signs of extremely skewed preference for tech stocks neared exhaustion by late June, especially relative to industrials and financials (here and here)
  • Indicators and studies for other markets are showing less consistent forward results, though it's not a great sign for Treasuries that hedgers were net short (starting to reverse now) and optimism on metals recently became extreme with concerning 100-day analogs, and recent "perfect" breadth among miners.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 37% Dumb Money Confidence: 65%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

Metals and bonds give different picture as excess liquidity spikes

BOTTOM LINE
Over the past few months, there has been a breakdown in many long-term relationships, like between the price of copper and the level of 10-year Treasury yields. That's driven in part by a surge in excess liquidity in the system.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

There are a lot of tables in this piece, so to summarize what may be an eye-watering amount of small numbers:

There is a historic divergence between copper and interest rates, driven in part by excess liquidity and suppressed rates. Prior divergences preceded some rocky times in stocks, and peaks in liquidity led to long-term declines in stock valuations. Both developments tended to lead to a drop in bond prices, and rise in yields. Other assets showed mixed returns.

The table below gives a quick overview of the longer-term returns in each asset.

AssetCopper / 10-Year Yield DivergencePeak in Excess Liquidity
StocksDownFlat
YieldsUpUp
DollarUpDown
GoldFlatDown


Copper vs. 10-Year Yields

There have been a lot of head-scratching moves in 2020, most of them in the past several months. The cross-currents battling it out in all markets are astounding, and many have never been seen before. One of the most consistent relationships, which has broken down in recent months, is between the price of copper futures and the yield on 10-year Treasury notes.

The two don't move hand-in-hand, but historically they have had a tight positive correlation. The same influences which would push copper higher (industrial demand and economic growth) are the same that would push yields higher. Until lately.

In recent months, copper has consistently held in the top 85% of its one-year range, while the 10-year yield has been stuck near the bottom 15% of its range.

This has been going on for much of the past 50 days, which is by far a new record.

For stocks, this kind of divergence was a mixed blessing, with varied returns over the medium- to long-term.

The dollar rebounded over the medium-term.

That was a headwind for gold but with only one large decline from 2008. The others saw rising prices longer-term.

Copper itself took the brunt of the selling.

10-year Treasury futures also tended to decline (meaning yields rose) over the medium-term, but a year later bond prices were higher.

Excess Liquidity

The primary reason for the disconnect between yields and economically-sensitive instruments like copper are the fundamental factors of generous fiscal and monetary stimuli coupled with actively-suppressed interest rates.

As the Daily Shot highlighted, there is a record amount of excess liquidity in the system, defined by the year-over-year growth in M2 money supply minus the year-over-year growth in U.S. GDP.

Stocks, and many other financial assets, tend to do well when excess liquidity is high. The issue is that it has already slowed down and has likely peaked.

That meant okay, but below average, long-term returns for stocks.

Perhaps most importantly, it led to a lower price/earnings multiple for the index. That's a particularly sensitive issue now since the P/E is at the upper end of its historical range. Only twice, in 1991 and 1996, did the S&P's multiple rise over a 2-year time frame, and both of those times the starting value was below 20.

The dollar tended to decline.

But that wasn't necessarily a big positive for gold.

The growth in inflation was positive, with some exceptions.

And that tended to coincide with a rise in 10-year yields.


Active Studies

Click here to view the Active Research the site.
Time FrameBullishBearish
Short-Term01
Medium-Term112
Long-Term472

Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 19%
Bullish for Stocks

SPY Liquidity Premium
VIX
AAII Bull Ratio
Inverse ETF Volume
Rydex Beta Chase Index
Rydex Bull/Bear RSI Spread
OEX Put/Call Ratio
CSFB Fear Barometer
Mutual Fund Flow (no ETFs)
% Showing Optimism: 27%
Bearish for Stocks

Smart Money / Dumb Money Confidence Spread
Dumb Money Confidence
NYSE Up Issues Ratio
NYSE High/Low Ratio
S&P 500 Down Pressure
Rydex Ratio
Rydex Money Market %
S&P 500 Price Oscillator
Equity Put/Call Ratio De-Trended
NYSE Up Volume Ratio
OEX Open Interest Ratio
SKEW Index
Options Speculation Index
AIM (Advisor and Investor Model)
ROBO Put/Call Ratio
LOBO Put/Call Ratio
Retail Money Market Ratio
NYSE Available Cash
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio
Mutual Fund Cash Level

Portfolio

PositionWeight %Added / ReducedDate
Stocks15.2Reduced 4.2%2020-09-03
Bonds30.0Added 30%2020-09-09
Commodities2.4Reduced 2.1%
2020-09-04
Precious Metals5.0Added 5%2020-09-09
Special Situations4.9Added 5.1%2020-09-03
Cash42.5
Updates (Changes made today are underlined)

After stocks bottomed on March 23rd, they enjoyed a historic buying thrust and retraced a larger amount of the decline than "just a bear market rally" tends to. Through June, there were signs of breadth thrusts, recoveries, and trend changes that have an almost unblemished record at preceding higher prices over a 6-12 month time frame.

On a shorter-term basis, our indicators have been showing high optimism, with Dumb Money Confidence recently above 80%, along with signs of reckless speculation during what appears to be an unhealthy market environment, historically a bad combination. While there are certainly some outlier indicators that are showing apathy or even outright pessimism, a weight-of-the-evidence approach suggests high risk over a multi-week to multi-month time frame.

That has been the case since July, even arguably June and yet the major indexes hit continual new highs through late August. With the indicators and studies failing to precede any weakness, I've been hesitant to lower my already-low exposure. I am getting increasingly anxious about the oddities we're seeing, though, and lowered it again. This account is mostly about comfort with risk for me, and right now I'm not at all comfortable with any of it. In more than 25 years of experience, this is the oddest market I've ever seen.

I lowered exposure again - likely the lowest I'm willing to go at this point given longer-term positives - and decided to switch to an equal-weight version of the S&P 500 index. I've become intensely uncomfortable with the concentration in the cap-weighted index. Our studies have been mixed with regard to the potential for the equal-weight version to outperform the cap version going forward, so historical support isn't overwhelming. I'm also increasingly interested again in energy stocks, starting with a small allocation. I got burned in March with the unprecedented geopolitical spat that hammered those stocks then but the longer-term setup is decent.

In this account, I’ve roughly followed what has become known as the All Weather portfolio popularized by Ray Dalio. It allocates across four broad assets, designed to hold up no matter the market environment. The goal is modest positive returns while limiting large, sustained losses. I typically use popular ETFs, with low costs. At times, I will swap out for a fund I believe has better prospects, or simply lower fees if not. At other times, I will diverge quite a bit from baseline allocations, largely depending on the indicators and studies we discuss on the site. I've gotten away from this in the past, using "cash" as a substitute for "bonds" and with rates stuck at 0%, that has become less appetizing. I'm trying to get back more toward the baselines with less dramatic swings in either direction.

The base allocation I use is the following:

Stocks: 35%
Bonds: 45%
Precious Metals: 7.5%
Commodities: 7.5%
Cash / Special Opportunities: 5%


RETURN YTD:  -0.9%

2019: 12.6%, 2018: 0.6%, 2017: 3.8%, 2016: 17.1%, 2015: 9.2%, 2014: 14.5%, 2013: 2.2%, 2012: 10.8%, 2011: 16.5%, 2010: 15.3%, 2009: 23.9%, 2008: 16.2%, 2007: 7.8%

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2025 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.