Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : Corporate insiders drift away from their buying binge; Too many S&P stocks underperforming by 10%

Jason Goepfert
2020-07-23
Corporate insiders were heavy buyers in March. They've gradually tapered off from their buying and selling pressure has picked up. Depending on the source, the amount that selling has picked up ranges from a little bit to a huge amount.; As the S&P 500 has climbed toward its prior highs, more than 25% of its stocks are underperforming the index by more than 10% during the past few months. That's a figure that's more typically seen during bear markets.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


Corporate insiders drift away from their buying binge: Corporate insiders were heavy buyers in March. They've gradually tapered off from their buying and selling pressure has picked up. Depending on the source, the amount that selling has picked up ranges from a little bit to a huge amount.

Too many S&P stocks underperforming by 10%: As the S&P 500 has climbed toward its prior highs, more than 25% of its stocks are underperforming the index by more than 10% during the past few months. That's a figure that's more typically seen during bear markets.

Active managers are nearly all-in: The latest survey of active investment managers from the NAAIM organization showed that the average manager is 97% exposed to stocks, with even the most bearish manager net long, and a small standard deviation among them (i.e. lots of group-think). We've been discussing this survey since its inception, with the conclusion that it's not necessarily a great contrarian indicator. There have been 11 weeks with similar positioning since 2006, and the S&P 500's forward returns were slightly better than random, but with a worse risk/reward skew. Those weeks were 2007-01-03, 2016-08-17, 2016-11-30, 2016-12-21, 2016-12-28, 2017-09-20, 2017-12-13, 2017-12-20, 2018-06-13, 2018-08-29, and 2019-12-18.

Bottom Line:

  • Weight of the evidence has been suggesting flat/lower stock prices short- to medium-term again; still suggesting higher prices long-term
  • Indicators show high optimism, with Dumb Money Confidence recently above 80% with signs of reckless speculation, historic buying pressure, then even more speculation during what appears to be an unhealthy market environment
  • Active Studies show a heavy positive skew over the medium- to long-term; breadth thrusts, recoveries, and trend changes have an almost unblemished record at preceding higher prices over a 6-12 month time frame
  • Signs of extremely skewed preference for tech stocks nearing exhaustion, especially relative to industrials and financials (here and here)
  • Indicators and studies for other markets are mixed with no strong conclusion, though it's not a great sign for Treasuries that hedgers are net short.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 31% Dumb Money Confidence: 80%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

Corporate insiders drift away from their buying binge

BOTTOM LINE
Corporate insiders were heavy buyers in March. They've gradually tapered off from their buying and selling pressure has picked up. Depending on the source, the amount that selling has picked up ranges from a little bit to a huge amount.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

Smart-money corporate insiders were heavy buyers in March, the data is pretty clear on that. Now they're either still buying, or selling heavily, depending on the source.

Insider transactions are one of those areas of sentiment that typically takes some finessing. Transactions are dependent on a lot of factors, and take many forms, most of them unrelated to sentiment. We prefer to use only open market transactions tracked by Bloomberg. When viewed that way, the Corporate Insider Buy/Sell Ratio for stocks within the S&P 500 is still quite positive.

It's especially high for certain sectors like Energy.

Below, we can see each of their ratios relative to the range over the past nine months.

When we look at the 4-week rate of change in insider buys minus insider sells for all S&P 500 stocks, they showed decade-high eagerness to buy in March and have since leveled off. Extremely eager buying was an excellent signal for future returns in the S&P 500; eager selling led to poor returns, at least over the short- to medium-term.

While buying interest among insiders has tailed off in recent weeks, it's still net positive. That's been a good sign for months and shows no looming signs of being a negative.

The only caveat is that other services are showing vastly different data. Bloomberg notes that according to the Washington Service, selling interest has picked up dramatically.

"Corporate insiders, whose buying correctly signaled the bottom in March, are now mostly sellers. Almost 1,000 corporate executives and officers have unloaded shares of their own companies this month, outpacing insider buyers by a ratio of 5-to-1, data compiled by the Washington Service showed. Only twice in the past three decades has the sell-buy ratio been higher than now."

Other times it got this high were mostly negative for stocks.

Parsing signal from noise in insider data takes specialized knowledge and good experience. There are dozens of services that focus on this data - most of them are decent, and most of them confirm what the others are saying. Unfortunately, the best ones are also only reserved for institutions, but it's not necessarily required to get a general handle on how corporate insiders are feeling about their stocks.

Right now, it's a confusing mix because various data providers aren't confirming each other as much as they usually do. About the best (or worst) we could say about these smart money transactions right now is that they've trailed off quite a bit from the buying binge in March. That might be enough to be a short- to medium-term headwind, but the massive buying this spring should continue to be a longer-term positive.


Too many S&P stocks underperforming by 10%

BOTTOM LINE
As the S&P 500 has climbed toward its prior highs, more than 25% of its stocks are underperforming the index by more than 10% during the past few months. That's a figure that's more typically seen during bear markets.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
SPY -- Down, Short-Term

We saw on Wednesday that the Cumulative Advance/Decline Line has broken out to a new high. The stocks-only line, however, is still lagging.

As noted by The Daily Shot, the percentage of stocks trailing the index by more than 10% has spiked. While we have different data sources and likely a different methodology, we can see that this is the case.

The chart shows the percentage of stocks within the S&P 500 that are trailing the index's returns by 10% or more over the past 13 weeks. It's not unusual to see this figure jump during bear markets, which it did during the pandemic, but it is relatively unusual to see so many stocks continue to lag the index by so much when the index has climbed close to its prior highs.

The table below shows every date since 1999 when the S&P was within 3.5% of its 52-week high and yet more than a quarter of its component stocks were trailing the index by double-digits.

Forward returns over the shorter-term were poor, with a very negative risk/reward skew during the next month. Even up to three months later, the risk/reward was more heavily tilted toward "risk".

We'd rate this as a modest shorter-term negative here.


Active Studies

Click here to view the Active Research the site.
Time FrameBullishBearish
Short-Term01
Medium-Term810
Long-Term441

Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 8%
Bullish for Stocks

VIX
Mutual Fund Flow (no ETFs)
% Showing Optimism: 33%
Bearish for Stocks

AIM (Advisor and Investor Model)
Smart Money / Dumb Money Confidence Spread
Intermediate Term Optimism Index (Optix)
Smart Money Confidence
Short-term Optimism Index (Optix)
Dumb Money Confidence
% Showing Excess Optimism
NYSE High/Low Ratio
S&P 500 Down Pressure
SPY Liquidity Premium
Rydex Ratio
Rydex Money Market %
Fidelity Funds Breadth
Equity Put/Call Ratio De-Trended
VIX Term Structure
OEX Put/Call Ratio
Equity Put/Call Ratio
SKEW Index
Options Speculation Index
ROBO Put/Call Ratio
NAAIM Exposure Index
Retail Money Market Ratio
NYSE Available Cash
Mutual Fund Cash Level

Portfolio

PositionWeight %Added / ReducedDate
Stocks29.8Reduced 9.1%2020-06-11
Bonds0.0Reduced 6.7%2020-02-28
Commodities5.2Added 2.4%
2020-02-28
Precious Metals0.0Reduced 3.6%2020-02-28
Special Situations0.0Reduced 31.9%2020-03-17
Cash65.0
Updates (Changes made today are underlined)

In the first months of the year, we saw manic trading activity. From big jumps in specific stocks to historic highs in retail trading activity to record highs in household confidence to almost unbelievable confidence among options traders.

All of that came amid a market where the average stock couldn't keep up with their indexes. There were signs of waning momentum in stocks underlying the major averages, which started triggering technical warning signs in late January. 

After stocks bottomed on the 23rd, they enjoyed a historic buying thrust and retraced a larger amount of the decline than "just a bear market rally" tends to. Those thrusts are the most encouraging sign we've seen in years. Through early June, we were still seeing thrusts that have led to recoveries in longer-term breadth metrics.

The longer-term prospects for stocks (6-12 months) still look decent given the above. On a short- to medium-term basis, it was getting harder to make that case. Dumb Money Confidence spiked and there were multiple signs of a historic level of speculation. This is likely the lowest I will go given what I still consider to be compelling positives over a longer time frame. There is not a slam-dunk case to be made for either direction, so it will seem like a mistake whether stocks keep dropping (why didn't I sell more?) or if they turn and head higher (why did I let short-term concerns prevail?). After nearly three decades of trading, I've learned to let go of the idea of perfection.


RETURN YTD: -4.1%

2019: 12.6%, 2018: 0.6%, 2017: 3.8%, 2016: 17.1%, 2015: 9.2%, 2014: 14.5%, 2013: 2.2%, 2012: 10.8%, 2011: 16.5%, 2010: 15.3%, 2009: 23.9%, 2008: 16.2%, 2007: 7.8%

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2025 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.