Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : When it comes to markets, "book learnin'" isn't necessarily a good thing; Options data shows concern is just a memory

Jason Goepfert
2020-05-12
A survey from the New York Fed shows high optimism about stocks among consumers. But that optimism isn't so evenly distributed. Ironically, the time to worry is when those with high incomes, high education, and high numeracy become the most optimistic compared to those without those qualities, and so far they're holding back.; Over the past couple of weeks, options traders have shifted their focus from protective puts to speculative calls. While the indicators aren't yet showing excessive optimism, it's clear that most of the fear has worn off and sentiment is, at worst, apathetic, and it happened fast. During a bear market, that's enough to be a concern.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


When it comes to markets, "book learnin'" isn't necessarily a good thing: A survey from the New York Fed shows high optimism about stocks among consumers. But that optimism isn't so evenly distributed. Ironically, the time to worry is when those with high incomes, high education, and high numeracy become the most optimistic compared to those without those qualities, and so far they're holding back.

Options data shows concern is just a memory: Over the past couple of weeks, options traders have shifted their focus from protective puts to speculative calls. While the indicators aren't yet showing excessive optimism, it's clear that most of the fear has worn off and sentiment is, at worst, apathetic, and it happened fast. During a bear market, that's enough to be a concern.

Almost, but not quite: After trading below its 200-day moving average for more than 30 days, the S&P 500 had nearly been able to overtake its widely-watched long-term average. Without being able to rise above its average, sellers stepped back in and slapped the index for a 2% loss on Tuesday. Of the 7 other times this happened, the S&P showed a negative return either 1 or 2 months later each time (the dates were 1941-04-08, 1988-04-14, 2000-11-10, 2008-06-06, 2009-05-11, and 2011-10-25). There were 17 times it was rejected by 1.5% or more, leading to rebounds only 25% of the time over the next 2 months. There were 48 times it was rejected by 1% or more, with rebounds 2 months later only 30% of the time. This isn't a great sign for bulls here.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 66% Dumb Money Confidence: 52%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

When it comes to markets, "book learnin'" isn't necessarily a good thing

BOTTOM LINE
A survey from the New York Fed shows high optimism about stocks among consumers. But that optimism isn't so evenly distributed. Ironically, the time to worry is when those with high incomes, high education, and high numeracy become the most optimistic compared to those without those qualities, and so far they're holding back.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) has been conducting an in-depth survey of consumers for about 7 years. One part of the survey asks for opinions about whether stocks will rise over the next year.

The latest data of about 1,300 consumers, out on Monday, showed an uptick in optimism, with the most-ever percentage of consumers expecting stocks to rise. Sounds troubling, so let's look.

The FRBNY isolates consumers' outlook about stocks over the next year by about a dozen demographic identifiers. The interesting thing is that when we look at each group's success at predicting the next year in stocks, the best-performing groups are the ones that should have the least knowledge. The worst-performing groups are the ones that should have the most.

None of them were especially successful at being bulling or bearish at the right times. But among the few demographics that showed a positive correlation were those with low numeracy (the confidence and skill to use numbers to solve problems in everyday life), those with at most a high school education, and those with incomes under $50,000/year.

The demographics with the worst forecasting records were those with high numeracy, high education, and high incomes. Most of us would probably think it should be the exact opposite, but markets don't necessarily reward book smarts.

If we look at the current optimism among those with "book smarts", it's well off the highs compared to those with "street smarts."  

When the spread has been high over the past 7 years, meaning when those with high income, education, and numeracy were much more optimistic than those with low income, education, and numeracy, stocks actually tended to suffer. When the book smart group was relatively pessimistic, stocks did well, mainly in 2014 and 2017.

The annualized return when the spread was above 9 was only +1.0% versus +12.2% when the spread was below 9, which is where it is now.

It's not like there's a super-wide divergence between the two at the moment. One might think that given the disproportion share of job losses among the "street smart" group, they would be much more pessimistic than the "book smart" group, but that's not the case. And it's probably a good thing, too, since they've had a better record at predicting the market than their more educated peers.

We can see a similar pattern when "sophisticates" in the northeast are more optimistic than "bumpkins" from the Midwest. This is coming from a lifelong midwest resident, so I would be firmly in the bumpkin category.

The spread between the two was about average for April, but it's interesting to note that when it's above 3, meaning those in the northeast are much more optimistic than midwesterners, the S&P's annualized return was much less than when those of us in flyover country were more positive.

There was even more of a stark divergence in north vs south optimism. 

Whenever those in the northeast were more than 3 percentage points more optimistic than those in the south, the S&P's annualized return was a wretched -6.7%. When southerners were more optimistic, that shot up to +22.6%.

Highly developed cities, especially those with exchanges, see a kind of sociological agglomeration of services for finance types, likely helping to form a sense of groupthink and herd mentality. While there are developed cities and exchanges in the midwest and elsewhere, there is much less of a focus on finance and markets. For the past 7 years at least, that seems to be a good thing. Consumers without that focus have had a better record at sensing the risks and opportunities in stocks than those more directly impacted by their movements.

As of now, that appears to be a slight positive. When the sophisticates and book smart folks become a lot more optimistic, then it will be more of a worry.


Options data shows concern is just a memory

BOTTOM LINE
Over the past couple of weeks, options traders have shifted their focus from protective puts to speculative calls. While the indicators aren't yet showing excessive optimism, it's clear that most of the fear has worn off and sentiment is, at worst, apathetic, and it happened fast. During a bear market, that's enough to be a concern.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

One of the many measures of panic that triggered in March was the overwhelming preference for traders to reach for put options, hedging against the possibility of further losses.

At its peak in March, the 10-day average of the Equity-only Put/Call Ratio neared 1.0, meaning more volume in protective put options than speculative calls. That's one of the highest readings in the history of the data. It has since calmed down and moved well into neutral territory.

We've seen time and time again that during bear markets, neutral sentiment is about all that's required before sellers do their thing again. That's what happened in 2008, the only other time the 10-day ratio reached as high as it did this year. Both times, when the put/call ratio dropped to its current level, that was about it for the rally attempts.

What's also notable about the current behavior of options traders is that they're shifting sentiment quickly. It has taken barely a month for the 10-day average of the put/call ratio to drop this much.

Even if we're in a bull market, which is when these quick shifts in sentiment tend to occur, future returns were iffy.

Other than March 2003, when stocks dropped quickly then recovered just as fast and showed sustained gains, most of the others saw weakness, or small or unsustained gains, in the months ahead. 

Contrast that to times when it took longer for traders to ease back on their bearish sentiment.

In these cases, returns were more likely to be positive over the short- to medium-term, and with a better risk/reward skew. There were still a couple of large losses, from the bottoming action in 2002 and the market peak in 2007, but overall it was a more positive bias than those times when the put/call ratio cycled quickly.

The ratio isn't yet showing an optimistic extreme. The troubling thing is that it has come down so quickly, though, especially since we're still mired in a downtrending market. It's a minor warning for the short- to medium-term, especially since overall speculation in options remains in the upper end of its range.

This is the highest the Options Speculation Index has ever been with the S&P 500 trading below its 50-week moving average, and while there has been a general trend higher in the data over the years, it's still higher than bulls would like to see.


Active Studies

Click here to view the Active Research the site.
Time FrameBullishBearish
Short-Term06
Medium-Term121
Long-Term373

Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 24%
Bullish for Stocks

Smart Money Confidence
VIX
Inverse ETF Volume
Fidelity Funds Breadth
NYSE Up Volume Ratio
VIX Transform
AIM (Advisor and Investor Model)
Equity Hedging Index
Mutual Fund Flow (no ETFs)
AAII Bull Ratio
Major Index Combo
% Showing Optimism: 16%
Bearish for Stocks

SPY Liquidity Premium
NYSE High/Low Ratio
Rydex Bearish Flow
Rydex Ratio
Rydex Money Market %
Rydex Sector Breadth
Equity Put/Call Ratio
OEX Put/Call Ratio
SKEW Index
Options Speculation Index
Retail Money Market Ratio
Mutual Fund Cash Level

Portfolio

PositionWeight %Added / ReducedDate
Stocks49.9Reduced 10.3%2020-04-23
Bonds0.0Reduced 6.7%2020-02-28
Commodities5.1Added 2.4%
2020-02-28
Precious Metals0.0Reduced 3.6%2020-02-28
Special Situations0.0Reduced 31.9%2020-03-17
Cash45.0
Updates (Changes made today are underlined)

In the first months of the year, we saw manic trading activity. From big jumps in specific stocks to historic highs in retail trading activity to record highs in household confidence to almost unbelievable confidence among options traders.

All of that came amid a market where the average stock couldn't keep up with their indexes. There were signs of waning momentum in stocks underlying the major averages, which started triggering technical warning signs in late January. 

The kinds of extremes we saw in December and January typically take months to wear away, but the type of selling in March went a long way toward getting there. When we place the kind of moves we saw into March 23 into the context of coming off an all-time high, there has been a high probability of a multi-month rebound. 

After stocks bottomed on the 23rd, they enjoyed a historic buying thrust and retraced a larger amount of the decline than "just a bear market rally" tends to. While other signs are mixed that panic is subsiding, those thrusts are the most encouraging sign we've seen in years. Shorter-term, there have been some warning signs popping up and our studies have stopped showing as positively skewed returns. I reduced my exposure some in late April and will consider further reducing it if we start to see some lower highs and lower lows. Long-term suggestions from the studies remain robust, but shorter-term ones are significantly less so, and stocks still have to prove that we're in something other than a protracted, recessionary bear market.


RETURN YTD: -9.5%

2019: 12.6%, 2018: 0.6%, 2017: 3.8%, 2016: 17.1%, 2015: 9.2%, 2014: 14.5%, 2013: 2.2%, 2012: 10.8%, 2011: 16.5%, 2010: 15.3%, 2009: 23.9%, 2008: 16.2%, 2007: 7.8%

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.