Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : Good quarters tend to beget good quarters; The years with sector and factor performance most like 2021

Jason Goepfert
2022-01-04
The S&P 500 Index gained 10.6% during the 4th quarter of 2021. Does this have any implications for the 1st quarter of 2022? This piece highlights the history of S&P 500 performance following particularly strong quarters.; A look at the years with the closest sector and factor performance to 2021 shows that 1996 led all years. Years with similar behavior preceded mostly good returns during the next year, with some evidence of mean-reversion among the sectors.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


Good quarters tend to beget good quarters: The S&P 500 Index gained 10.6% during the 4th quarter of 2021. Does this have any implications for the 1st quarter of 2022? This piece highlights the history of S&P 500 performance following particularly strong quarters.

The years with sector and factor performance most like 2021: A look at the years with the closest sector and factor performance to 2021 shows that 1996 led all years. Years with similar behavior preceded mostly good returns during the next year, with some evidence of mean-reversion among the sectors.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 46% Dumb Money Confidence: 62%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

Good quarters tend to beget good quarters

By Jay Kaeppel

BOTTOM LINE
The S&P 500 Index gained 10.6% during the 4th quarter of 2021. Does this have any implications for the 1st quarter of 2022? This piece highlights the history of S&P 500 performance following particularly strong quarters.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
SPY -- Up, Medium-Term

Key points:

  • The S&P 500 Index gained +10.6% during the 4th quarter of 2021
  • Historically, a quarterly performance of +9% or more has been followed by another up quarter 84% of the time

Quarters up 9% or more

We define a quarter as any three months ending in March, June, September, or December. 

There have been 56 quarters that have seen the S&P 500 Index gain +9% or more in price since 1933. Forty-seven of those quarters were followed by another up quarter. Only nine times did the S&P 500 decline over the next quarter.

The chart below displays the quarterly performance for the S&P 500 following quarters of +9% or more.

The chart below displays the cumulative growth of $1 invested in the S&P 500 for three months after a +9% quarter.

The table below displays a summary of performance results.

What the research tells us…

Traders should not assume that the first quarter of 2022 is sure to show a gain for the S&P 500 Index. An 84% success rate is a powerful indication, but it does not guarantee success. Still, the latest signal suggests that as long as price action holds up, investors should continue to give the bullish case the benefit of the doubt.


The years with sector and factor performance most like 2021

By Jason Goepfert

BOTTOM LINE
A look at the years with the closest sector and factor performance to 2021 shows that 1996 led all years. Years with similar behavior preceded mostly good returns during the next year, with some evidence of mean-reversion among the sectors.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

Key points:

  • There have been 15 years since 1928 with sector and factor performance similar to 2021
  • After those years, the S&P 500 showed modest medium-term returns and decent long-term ones
  • Defensive sectors showed better returns overall, as did Small-Cap stocks

The year most like 2021 was...1996

Near the end of the year, we looked at the S&P 500's closest analogs. In terms of pure price performance for the index itself, the highest-correlated year was 1995.

If we look at performance under the surface, things change a bit. In 2021, Energy and REITs were the highest-ranked sectors, while the Small-Cap factor took up the rear. This is using total return and ranked against the return of all other sectors and factors. In 1995, Health Care and Financials led everything else, though Small-Caps were still weak.

Using the correlation between sector and factor ranks, 1995 doesn't show up as the closest correlation (+0.27 out of a scale from -1.0 to +1.0). That honor belongs to the following year (0.69). Most sectors/factors with high (green) and low (red) rankings in 2021 showed similar rankings in 1996.

Like we saw with the S&P analog, years with the highest sector and factor correlations to 2021 showed strength in the first couple of weeks, then less so.

Some signs of sector mean-reversion

For the sectors and factors themselves, there was some evidence of mean-reversion. Energy stocks were the weakest performers over the next couple of months, while Small-Cap stocks were the strongest. Perpetually suffering Value stocks showed admirable performance as well.

Looking at the consistency of returns - how often the sectors and factors showed a positive return across time frames - there was a bias toward some of the more defensive sectors while higher-beta ones suffered a bit.

What the research tells us...

Bulls might take heart that the price behavior and sector returns most like 2021 can be found in the mid-1990s, right before one of the best runs in equity market history. About the only negatives when looking at similar years were relatively soft returns through February/March but few of them saw more than double-digit drawdowns, at least through the next 6 months.


Active Studies

Click here to view the Active Research on the site.
Time FrameBullishBearish
Short-Term20
Medium-Term122
Long-Term104

Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 5%
Bullish for Stocks

Inverse ETF Volume
Rydex Bearish Flow
Risk Appetite Index
% Showing Optimism: 47%
Bearish for Stocks

Stock/Bond Ratio
Short-term Optimism Index (Optix)
NYSE Arms Index
Dumb Money Confidence
VIX Term Structure
% Showing Excess Pessimism
% Showing Excess Optimism
Rydex Money Market %
Rydex Ratio
NYSE High/Low Ratio
SKEW Index
CSFB Fear Barometer
Equity Put/Call Ratio
OEX Put/Call Ratio
OEX Open Interest Ratio
Options Speculation Index
LOBO Put/Call Ratio
ROBO Put/Call Ratio
NAAIM Exposure Index
Mutual Fund Flow (no ETFs)
AIM (Advisor and Investor Model)
Retail Money Market Ratio
Mutual Fund Cash Level
NYSE Available Cash
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio
AAII Allocation - Stocks
VIX Transform

Portfolio

PositionDescriptionWeight %Added / ReducedDate
StocksRSP35.9Added 25.2%2022-01-03
Bonds32.7% BND, 7.1% SCHP39.8Added 8.3%2021-10-26
CommoditiesGCC2.4Reduced 2.1%
2020-09-04
Precious MetalsGDX4.6Reduced 4.2%2021-05-19
Special Situations9.8% KWEB, 4.7% XLE, 2.9% PSCE17.3Added 9.78%2021-10-01
Cash0.1
Updates (Changes made today are underlined)

Coinciding with the new year, there was a thrust in participation in the S&P 500 near the end of December. Thrusts have been among the most consistent signals over the decades, and this is hard to ignore. I have greater confidence in thrusts when coming off extreme pessimism, like the spring of 2020, as opposed to near all-time highs on low volume. Still, it's hard to justify not being at least neutral weight stocks given this behavior.

Bond sentiment is trying to recover from a recent bout of pessimism, and gold stocks are doing their thing which is not much at all. They've been flat for six months. Chinese tech stocks were doing exactly what they're supposed to do, then did *not* by plunging to new lows. This is troubling on a shorter-term time frame, but this was never meant for a trade, rather a multi-year investment. Recent behavior is troubling and I will not be adding any exposure as long as that's the case.

RETURN YTD:  +0.3%

2020: +8.7%,  2020: +8.1%, 2019: +12.6%, 2018: +0.6%, 2017: +3.8%, 2016: +17.1%, 2015: +9.2%, 2014: +14.5%, 2013: +2.2%, 2012: +10.8%, 2011: +16.5%, 2010: +15.3%, 2009: +23.9%, 2008: +16.2%, 2007: +7.8%

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.