Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Buying thrusts are broad, persistent, and global

Jason Goepfert
2023-01-17
Surging securities across the NYSE in recent weeks have triggered multiple breadth thrusts. Different models, using various thresholds and lookback periods, have triggered buy signals. They have rarely, if ever, preceded losses in the S&P 500 over the following year. The same holds when there is a strong recovery in global markets in uptrends.

Key points:

  • A surge in advancing securities in recent weeks has triggered multiple breadth thrusts
  • Different types of systems based on NYSE data have spurred dynamic buy signals
  • There has also been a strong recovery in global indexes above their 200-day moving averages
  • After similar thrusts, it was rare or nonexistent to see losses in the S&P 500 over the next year

Thrust after thrust

One of the original proponents of analyzing breadth thrusts, Walter Deemer, recently noted that enough securities have risen in recent days to trigger Breakaway Momentum.

We use different data and different methodologies. There are pros and cons to using a ratio (up divided by down) versus a percentage (up divided by up + down). We've always favored the latter, which is what we show on the site. One "pro" of using the former methodology is those extremely positive days when investors overwhelmingly favor buying can quickly skew the figures and trigger thrusts. Most of those don't fail.

If we look at 10- and 20-day moving averages of both Up Issues / Down Issues and Up Volume / Down Volume, we just cycled from a relatively low reading to a high one.

When these cycles occurred within a month, and the S&P 500 was well into correction territory, it never suffered a loss over the next year. On average, it returned more than 24%, and the risk/reward was skewed heavily to the upside.

A table of maximum gains to maximum losses over each time frame shows that only three signals suffered more than a 10% drawdown at any point within the next year, while every signal rallied at least 10%.

Another type of thrust

Another type of thrust, popularized by Wayne Whaley, suffered a near-miss in April 2020, but we noted at the time why that didn't matter. It's the thought that counts. Any system that relies on an indicator going to one or two decimal points should be immediately suspect.

Taking some liberties with the system, the last five sessions have triggered lower thresholds. These combined thrusts are very rare, having triggered only a handful of times since 1950.

If we just focus on Whaley's original conditions for a thrust based on NYSE Up Issues alone (ignoring volume and price action), there were 30 signals since 1950. Impressively, every one preceded a positive return in the S&P 500 over the following year.

Thrusts are going global

We've also noted multiple times that stocks worldwide are advancing quickly, in many cases more impressively than in the U.S. Dean showed that as of last week, no major market index was in a bear market, a remarkable recovery from 2022. Coincident to that recovery, at least 90% of them were holding above their 200-day moving average at one point last week.

When these markets cycled from having no indexes above their 200-day average to more than 90% of them within 50 days, global stocks continued their rally in the months ahead.

When the recoveries took longer - on average, twice as long - forward returns were significantly lower and more prone to limited gains and large losses.

What the research tells us...

Like many of you probably are, I'm tired of hearing about breadth thrusts. They arguably triggered several times last year and inarguably failed. With the increasing accessibility of data and software, the concepts of breadth and related movements have become commonplace and likely overdone. It's very possible that any edge gleaned from these over the decades has softened and maybe even evaporated, at least for the broader U.S. stock market.

That said, on Friday, Dean noted that thrusts are occurring across exchanges and even within sectors, factors, and other markets like bonds. When there are coordinated bursts of buying pressure like this, it has boded very well for future returns. We can add global indexes to the list of markets seeing overwhelming buying interest. Of course, this isn't the first time there has been a wave of buying pressure during the bear market, but it is the first time it has occurred to this degree and is broader than prior attempts. Behavior like this, to this magnitude, persistence, and breadth, is exceptionally rare during ongoing bear markets. It is almost entirely relegated to the initial thrusts of new, protracted bull markets.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.