Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Absolute & Relative Trend Update

Dean Christians
2021-08-23
Let's review several absolute and relative trend indicators for domestic and international ETFs.

The goal of today's note is to provide you with some insight into what I am seeing with my absolute and relative trend following indicators for domestic and international ETFs.

Data as of 8/20/21 close. All relative comparisons are versus the S&P 500 ETF (SPY). For absolute and relative indicator definitions, please scroll down to the end of the note. 

ABSOLUTE & RELATIVE TRENDS - SECTOR ETFS

Last week, the relative trend backdrop turned defensive with relative highs from utilities, staples, health care, and real estate. The utilities led the way with a six-point increase in its relative trend score and a new relative high on all five trading days. I would also note that relative trend scores for the more offensive or cyclical-oriented sectors turned down.

The equal-weighted sectors confirmed the cap-weighted data with a more defensive tone. 

Small-cap sectors now show zero groups with a positive relative trend score versus the S&P 500.

The weight-of-the-evidence continues to suggest that small caps are in the penalty box until further notice.

ABSOLUTE & RELATIVE TRENDS - INDUSTRIES

Suppose you sort the industry table according to the relative trend change. In that case, we see that twelve groups registered a decrease in their respective relative trend score with not a single increase from an industry. I would also add that no groups registered a new relative high, whereas several recorded multiple lows.

ABSOLUTE & RELATIVE TRENDS - THEMATIC ETFS

The relative trends for thematic groups look troubling except for the Lithium and Battery Technolgy ETF. I would note that the Electric Vehicle ETF had been a standout until last week. Looking at the relative high and low count columns, we see that relative lows are abundant.

ABSOLUTE & RELATIVE TRENDS - COUNTRIES

Suppose I sort the Country table by the relative trend score change column. In that case, it shows several emerging market countries with a notable decrease in their respective relative trend scores on a w/w basis. 

If you had a chance to read my Dollar Index note from Friday, it showed that emerging markets would struggle in a dollar uptrend.

An emerging market country, Brazil saw its relative trend score fall to -10 for the first time since March.

The percentage of countries with a relative trend score of -10 remains at a level that suggests negative forward returns for a broad-based global allocation.  

GLOBAL RELATIVE TRENDS

The percentage of countries with a positive relative trend score versus the S&P 500 decreased on a w/w basis. The current level suggests an unfavorable environment for the MSCI ACWI World Index ex USA.

ALL COUNTRY RELATIVE TREND CHART

The percentage of countries with a relative trend score of -10 versus the S&P 500 remains at a level that suggests negative returns for the MSCI ACWI World Index ex USA.

The percentage of countries in the Asia Pacific region with a relative trend score of -10 remains at a level that is concerning.

We've noted the weak relative trends for the Asia Pacific region for some time now. The disconnect between the MSCI Asia Pacific Index and the S&P 500 Index caught our eye last week as the divergence has taken a turn for the worse. As of Friday, I show the S&P 500 trading 0.81% below its 252-day high. At the same time, the MSCI Asia Pacific Index is trading 13.45% below its respective 252-day high.

Let's conduct a study to assess the forward return outlook for the MSCI Asia Pacific Index when the distance from the 252-day high spread for the two indexes crosses below -12%.

HISTORICAL CHART

The chart clearly shows that a disconnect between the two indexes typically only occurs in times of market stress for the Asia region.

HOW THE SIGNALS PERFORMED

The short-term returns provide a mean reversion opportunity. However, I would keep a short leash on the idea as the intermediate to long-term performance looks troubling.

Let's isolate the historical instances some more by requiring that the S&P 500 be down 1% or less from its respective 252-day high when the spread crosses below -12%.

HOW THE SIGNALS PERFORMED

Interestingly, the new condition only eliminated three historical instances. So, that means that it's pretty common to see a disconnect similar to the current scenario. Once again, the study shows a short-term mean reversion opportunity exists. However, keep a short leash.

HOW THE SIGNALS PERFORMED - S&P 500 INDEX

Besides a few signals, the disconnect between the Asia Pacific Index and the S&P 500 had little impact on large-cap domestic stocks. Interestingly, the last instance occurred in August 2018. Does history repeat with a 4th quarter correction in the S&P 500?

In a note on 7/7/21, I shared a study that assessed the forward return outlook for stocks when the percentage of countries outperforming the S&P 500 on a rolling 21-day basis falls to a low level. Here's a snapshot of the indicator broken down by worldwide regions.

ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE TREND COLUMN DEFINITIONS

  1. Absolute Trend Count Score - The absolute trend model contains ten indicators to assess absolute trends across several durations.
  2. Absolute Trend 5-Day Change - This indicator measures the 5-day net change in the absolute trend model.
  3. Relative Trend Count Score - The relative trend model contains ten indicators to assess relative trends vs. the S&P across durations.
  4. Relative Trend 5-Day Change - This indicator measures the 5-day net change in the relative trend model.
  5. Relative High Count - This indicator measures the number of 21-day relative highs vs. the S&P 500 in the last 5 days.
  6. Relative Low Count - This indicator measures the number of 21-day relative lows vs. the S&P 500 in the last 5 days.
  7. Absolute and Relative Trend Scores range from 10 (Best) to -10 (Worst)
  8. MA Trend Cnt Above - This indicator counts the number of consecutive days above the 10-day moving average.
  9. MA Trend Cnt Below - This indicator counts the number of consecutive days below the 10-day moving average.


Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.