Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

Jay Kaeppel
2024-05-09
The Zweig Breadth Thrust indicator recently rose above 61.5%. However, it failed to do so within ten days of a low below 0.40. How much does that matter? We examine the history herein.

Key points

  • The bad news is that the market failed to achieve an "official" Zweig Breadth Thrust
  • The good news is that it came close - and historically, that's typically been a good sign
  • Following any ZBT cross above 60%, 12-month Win Rates for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 are 91% and 98%, respectively

A near miss

An official Zweig Breadth Thrust occurs when the 10-day moving average for the percentage of advancing stocks on the New York Stock Exchange rises from 40% or lower to 61.5% or higher in ten trading days or less. 

This signal has only happened 18 times since 1945. The most recent signal was on 2024-11-3. Following the previous 17 signals, the S&P 500 rose over the next 12 months 100% of the time, with a median gain of +22.9%. Since 2024-11-03, the S&P 500 has gained +19%.

The indicator (i.e., the 10-day average of NYSE advances versus declines) recently completed a run from 36% to 63%. However, the move took more than ten trading days to complete. So technically, it failed to qualify as an "official" Zweig Breadth Thrust. That's the bad news.

The good is that it might not matter all that much.

The history of near misses

Let's consider a much less stringent test. For this test, we will consider any reading by our Zweig Breadth Thrust indicator that crosses above 0.60 (i.e., 60%).

The chart below highlights all dates when the ZBT crossed above 0.60, regardless of whether it first dropped below 0.40. In other words, any crosses above 0.60 are considered. The most recent signal occurred on 2023-05-06.

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

Just eyeballing the chart suggests that this signal tends to occur within the context of a new or ongoing bull market. The results below, which summarize SPX performance following these signals, appear to quantify that subjective take.

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

The critical thing to note is the high Win Rates across the board. The charts below show signals ten years at a time. About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

A look at the Nasdaq 100

We also get some interesting results if we apply an NYSE Zweig Breadth Thrust crossing above 0.60 to the Nasdaq 100 Index.

The chart below uses the Nasdaq 100 as the measuring stick and highlights all dates when the ZBT crossed above 0.60, regardless of whether or not it first dropped below 0.40. In other words, any crosses above 0.60 are considered.

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

The table below summarizes Nasdaq 100 performance.

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

As with most all things in the market, nothing is ever perfect. Consider the following tradeoff.

The good news: As you can see in the screenshot below, of the 132 signals versus the Nasdaq 100 since 1985, the Nasdaq 100 has shown a subsequent 12-month gain 130 times and a loss only twice.

The bad news: The losses were a -35.08% loss following the 2002-03-06 signal and a -35.55% loss following the 2008-02-01 signal.

About that near-miss Zweig Breadth Thrust

What the research tells us…

The bottom line: The recent cross above 60% by the Zweig Breadth Thrust indicator does not guarantee that the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 are sure to rise over the next year. Nevertheless, history strongly suggests that investors give bullish case the benefit of the doubt until they are given a solid reason to think otherwise.

Jay's Trading Maxim #18: Follow the trend, but DO NOT fall in love with the trend.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.