Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

A Logical Bond Market Experiment (That Just Might Work)

Jay Kaeppel
2021-10-06
Inflation is the enemy of the bond market. So logically, it would seem that holding bonds when inflation is tame and holding something else as a hedge against inflation when inflation picks up might be a worthwhile strategy. Does this theory hold water? In this piece, we test the theory with a simple strategy.

Inflation is an enemy of the bond market. When a bond buyer buys a bond, they typically lock in a rate of return based on the amount of interest the bond pays annually. If inflation rises while that bond is held, the purchasing power of the future interest payments is reduced, as is the value of that bond.

One potential exception is TIPS bonds (Treasury-Inflation Protected Securities). In short, the principal value of a TIPs bond is reset every six months based on changes in the Consumer Price Index, and interest is paid based on that adjusted principal value. So, if inflation soars during the life of a particular TIPs bond, the amount of interest paid to the bondholders is increased. This increase in interest paid helps offset some or all of the purchasing power lost to inflation.

If you want more information on the nitty-gritty of TIPs, I suggest Google and/or this helpful primer.

The purpose of this piece is not to argue the pros and cons of TIPs. The purpose of this piece is to test a theory and one specific approach in attempting to maximize bond returns regardless of inflation. 

THE DATA

For our initial test, we will use total return data for:

  • Ticker IEF ( iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF )
  • Ticker STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) 

The data measures we will use as indicators are:

  • A = 5-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate: The yield on a 5-year treasury security (analyzed at the end of each week)
  • B = 5-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate: The difference between the 5-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate and the yield on inflation-protected security with 5-years remaining to maturity (analyzed at the end of each week)
  • C = (A - B)

The chart below displays Variables A and B.

The chart below shows the difference between the two lines in the chart above and plots Variable C.

The bottom line is pretty straightforward: Sometimes the Constant Maturity Rate is higher, and sometimes the Breakeven Inflation Rate is higher (i.e., sometimes Variable C is positive, and sometimes it's negative).  So, one question I asked was, "does it make any difference to bond prices?" 

In theory, straight treasuries are more attractive when Variable C is positive, and TIPs are more attractive when Variable C is negative.  So the other question I asked was, "does this logical theory hold water?"

THE TEST

For the sake of testing, we will set our "cutoff" at 0.1 for our Indicator (Variable C). In other words:

  • If (the 5-Year Constant Maturity Rate minus the 5-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate) is GREATER than 0.1, we will deem this as "Favorable"
  • If (the 5-Year Constant Maturity Rate minus the 5-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate) is LESS than OR EQUAL to 0.1, we will deem this as "Unfavorable"

We will initially look at ticker IEF (which has total return data back to 2003).  The chart below displays the results.

The table below summarizes the two sets of data.

From January 2003 through 10/1/2021:

  • Variable C was above 0.1 59.9% of the time and during that time gained 143.7%
  • Variable C was at or below 0.1 40.1% of the time and during that time lost -4.1% 

ADDING IN TIPS

For the next test, we will also consider total return data for ticker STIP starting the week ending 12/3/2010 (first week of available data).

We will test the following "Switching Strategy":

  • IF Variable C > 0.1 THEN hold IEF
  • IF Variable C<= 0.1 THEN hold STIP

We will also compare the return to buying and holding ticker IEF.  The chart below displays the comparative results.

The table below summarizes the performance numerically

SUMMARY

This little experiment is by no means the "be all, end all" of investment strategies. Likewise, a 10-year test may not capture all environments that a bond strategy might encounter over time. 

Still, compared to buying-and-holding IEF, the "Switch Strategy" did achieve:

  • Higher returns
  • More consistently
  • With less volatility
  • With lower drawdowns

The relative merits of this one example strategy aside, the real bottom line is that bond investors may be wise to watch interest rates versus the inflation rate breakeven price.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.