Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

A bullish win streak for the S&P 500

Dean Christians
2023-04-20
The S&P 500 closed above its 10-day average for 21 consecutive trading days, triggering a buy signal for a TCTM Composite Confirmation Model component. Over the past 95 years, similar win streaks preceded solid returns, win rates, and z-scores for the S&P 500.

Key points:

  • The S&P 500 closed above its 10-day average for 21 consecutive trading days 
  • Similar win streaks over the past 95 years preceded solid returns and win rates 
  • Signals that occurred after a 252-day low showed slightly more favorable results

Win streaks typically foreshadow a bearish-to-bullish trend change

When stock indexes are in a downtrend or in the early stages of forming a bottom, price action is volatile, and indexes rarely sustain themselves above a short-term moving average for an extended period. However, when an index can hold above its average for a significant number of days after a lengthy stretch below, the market is most likely shifting to an uptrend.

To capture this bearish-to-bullish moving average reversal pattern, I created a trading signal, which is a member of the TCTM Composite Confirmation Model. 

The moving average reversal model has an excellent record of avoiding whipsaw signals in bear markets. So, the untimely alert in 2022 was rare. Still, when a failure occurs, the market is more likely to correct through time, not price. 

The model identifies a period when the S&P 500 closes below its 10-day average for a minimum of 12 consecutive trading days. i.e., an oversold condition. Once that setup is achieved, the system will trigger a buy signal when the Index sustains itself above the 10-day average for 21 successive trading days.

Similar win streak signals preceded consistent gains and avoided most bear markets

The moving average reversal model generated a signal 79 other times over the past 95 years. After the others, S&P 500 future returns, win rates, and z-scores were excellent across medium and long-term horizons. 

Over the next six months, a max loss of greater than 10% occurred in 11 out of 79 cases. And out of those 11 instances, only one exceeded 20%.  I would also note that between 1979 and 2019, a 40-year period, not one signal exceeded a 10% drawdown over that same horizon.

Signals after the S&P 500 closed at a 252-day low

The signal from August 2022 and this most recent one occurred after the S&P 500 closed at a 252-day low. So, let's isolate precedents with that context in mind.

Signals triggered after a 252-day low show slightly more favorable results across most trading statistics, especially the 12-month win rate and return. Besides 1930, drawdowns a year later were mild. 

What happens when the signal fails to turn the S&P 500 trend bullish

Since 1928, the model failed to turn the S&P 500 trend from bearish to bullish five times during a drawdown phase, including the August 2022 signal. 

The 1929-32 bear market

The 1930 alert was the only one that saw the Index move meaningfully below the previous bear market low. With a second signal triggering this week, a 1929-32 scenario seems unlikely.

The 1946-49 bear market

The 1946-49 bear market was the only time in history when multiple signals failed to generate a new uptrend. So, if the April 2022 alert fails, a 1946-49 scenario looks more likely, which I've highlighted in other research notes.

The 1956-57 bear market

While the 1957 signal undercut the previous bear market low by -8%, the second alert ushered in one of the best six-month returns for all historical instances.

The 1960 correction/bear market

A slight undercut of the previous low was followed by a bullish second signal roughly seven months later.

The current bear market

Similar to 1960, we see the S&P 500 barely undercut the previous bear market low and a second signal eight months later.

What the research tells us...

The S&P 500 closed above its 10-day average for 21 consecutive trading days, triggering the second buy signal for a TCTM Composite Confirmation Model component in seven months. After similar price trend alerts, returns, win rates, and z-scores for the S&P 500 were excellent across medium and long-term horizons, especially if a signal occurred after a 1-year low. Should the most recent alert fail to usher in a new bull market, a trading range similar to the 1946-49 bear market looks more likely.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.