Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

A bullish long-term trend change for a commodity index

Dean Christians
2023-09-06
The Bloomberg Spot Commodity Index closed above its 200-day average for the first time in a year, triggering a bullish long-term trend change signal. Similar price trend shifts led to higher prices for a commodity index 100% of the time over the subsequent six and twelve-month horizons.

Key points:

  • The Bloomberg Spot Commodity Index closed above its 200-day average for the first time in a year
  • Similar trend change signals led to higher commodity prices over the next six and twelve months every time 
  • The energy sector outperforms all other groups over the following year

A commodity index transitions to a long-term uptrend

Commodities, a proxy for global growth, suffered a similar fate to equity indexes, sliding roughly -30% on fears of an economic contraction after central banks increased interest rates at one of the quickest paces in history. 

After 251 consecutive trading days below its 200-day moving average, the 8th longest streak in 90 years, the Bloomberg Spot Commodity Index has finally closed above its long-term price trend indicator.

Let's assess the outlook for a broad basket of commodities and stocks after similar trend change signals. 

Similar trend changes led to higher commodity prices over the next year

When the Bloomberg Spot Commodity Index broke above its 200-day moving average for the first time in more than a year, a diverse basket of commodities exhibited lackluster returns in the ensuing months. Nevertheless, this initial lull eventually paved the way for a sustained uptrend, with the index registering a gain 100% of the time over the subsequent six and twelve-month horizons.

By reducing the threshold to 175 trading days below the 200-day average, we can generate six additional precedents. A year later, the Bloomberg Spot Commodity Index was higher 85% of the time, with a median gain of 14.7%.

Following similar trend change shifts, drawdowns remained subdued, with the most significant loss within the subsequent year reaching just -8.2%. 

Energy, a sector showing renewed strength after consolidating for the last year, is the clear-cut winner after the Bloomberg Spot Commodity Index shifts to a new uptrend like now. 

An increase in participation from other commodities would bolster the case for a new uptrend

While there has been a trend change at the index level, it's important to note that broad participation is uninspiring, with fewer than 50% of commodities above their respective 200-day averages. Historically, the Bloomberg Spot Commodity Index delivers robust returns when over 75% of commodities are trading above their long-term averages.

Do commodity downtrends foreshadow recessions?

The last time an extended period below the 200-day average was associated with a recession was in 1982. So, should we be using commodities as a proxy for economic contractions?

In light of the unfavorable shift in commodity seasonality, as outlined by my colleague Jay Kaeppel in a recent research report, the uninspiring price action expected in the coming months following the trend change signal may offer an entry opportunity for an ETF like GSG.

What the research tells us...

The Bloomberg Spot Commodity Index closed above its 200-day average for the first time in a year. After similar trend change signals, the index rallied 100% of the time over the subsequent six and twelve-month periods. Even when I reduced the threshold to less than nine months, the commodity basket was higher 85% of the time over the following year, with a robust gain of 14.7%. With the last prolonged period below the average associated with a recession occurring in 1982, one has to wonder how much emphasis one should place on commodities as a harbinger of economic contractions.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.