Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Why semiconductors matter

Jay Kaeppel
2024-12-09
Does the stock market perform better when the semiconductor industry is performing well? We put that theory to the test. Details herein.

Key points

  • The semiconductor sector is considered by many to be something of a bellwether for the overall stock market
  • The theory is that the overall stock market tends to perform better when the semiconductor industry is outperforming the overall market
  • We put that theory to the test in the information below

Semiconductors versus the broader market

Not every indicator is meant to be used as a standalone trading model, i.e., generating specific and automatic buy and sell signals. Some indicators are best used as weight of the evidence. Specifically, when the indicator is deemed bullish, it is presumed that there is a higher probability that the overall market is on a bullish trend and vice versa. The relationship between the semiconductor industry and the S&P 500 offers a case in point.

Our operating theory for this test is that the S&P 500 index should perform better when the semiconductor sector outperforms it than when the semiconductor sector underperforms it.

For our test, we will use weekly total return data for the S&P 500 Index (SPXT) and the Fidelity Electronics Select Sector mutual fund (FSELX) starting on 1988-01-08. FSELX was selected because it has a more extended history than ETFs, such as ticker SMH, but trades with a 98% correlation to SMH.

A = We divide FSELX by SPXT each week to get a relative ratio.

B = We will also calculate a 78-week (i.e., 1.5 years) exponential moving average of the ratio at the end of each week

C = A - B

If C > 0, we deem the trend favorable

If C < 0 we deem the trend unfavorable

The chart below displays Variable A, the weekly FSELX/SPXT ratio

The chart below also adds Variable B, the 78-week EMA.

Finally, the chart below subtracts Variable B from Variable A and arrives at Variable C.

Testing favorable versus unfavorable readings

We consider the trend to be favorable when Variable C is positive. The chart below displays the hypothetical growth of $1 invested in SPXT only when Variable C is positive.

The chart below displays the same data using a logarithmic scale.

The hypothetical net gain since 1988, when this indicator is deemed favorable, is +3,184%. As importantly, note the lack of prolonged and deep bear market declines.

Let's examine the S&P 500's performance when the FSELX/SPXT Ratio is below its 78-week EMA (i.e. when Variable C is negative). The chart below displays the hypothetical growth of $1 invested in SPXT only when Variable C is negative.

Two things to note. First, the chart above has shown a gain of 67% since 1988. So, it would be technically incorrect to deem this "bearish." That said, no new money has been made since 1991.

Next, let's consider equity drawdowns during favorable and unfavorable periods. The chart below displays the percentage drawdowns for favorable (black line) and unfavorable (blue line) periods.

Three favorable periods have had drawdowns greater than -15% and a maximum drawdown (during the COVID selloff in 2020) of -31.7%. At their worst, unfavorable periods suffered a maximum drawdown of -57.8%.

The table below summarizes what we have seen so far.

Digging a little deeper

Next, look at the S&P 500's weekly performance depending on whether the FSELX/SPXT Ratio is above or below its 78-week EMA. The table below summarizes weekly SPXT performance during all "favorable" weeks versus all "unfavorable" weeks.

The table above shows weekly results favoring favorable periods in terms of Win Rate, Average and Median returns, and Average returns divided by Standard Deviation (i.e., risk-adjusted returns).

Finally, considering returns during each completed favorable and unfavorable period since 1988, we see the results below using S&P 500 total return data.

The table below summarizes performance for favorable versus unfavorable periods.

What the research tells us…

Does the FSELX/SPXT ratio have value as a standalone trading model? That determination is in the eye of the beholder. That, however, is not the argument being made here. The question is, "Does the semiconductor industry have value as a market bellwether?" The answer to that question (using FSELX as a proxy for the semiconductor industry) appears to be "Yes" - i.e., the broader market (as measured by SPXT) tends to perform better when semiconductors are outperforming.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.