Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

When Bonds Don't Provide a Buffer

Jason Goepfert
2021-05-17
The correlation between stocks and bond yields has plunged to the most negative in years, meaning bond prices haven't served to protect against (rare) declines in stocks. This has been a negative sign in the past, favoring bonds over the medium-term.

When stocks have been falling, bonds haven't provided much of a haven. And it's scaring some investors that held ingrained beliefs about the nature of the two assets to backstop each other.

Over the past 60 days, the correlation of daily changes between the S&P 500 and 10-year Treasury yields has turned decidedly negative. This means that on days when the S&P fell, note yields often rose, meaning bond prices declined along with stocks. When both stocks and bonds fall together, then a large part of most investors' portfolios take a hit.

The chart above shows that the correlation is now among the most negative in 25 years. Zooming out for a longer view, we can see that a negative correlation was more the rule than the exception.

STOCKS, YIELDS BOTH STUMBLED

As for the implications, the table below shows future returns in the S&P 500 once the correlation between it and note yields fell to -0.3 for the 1st time in at least 6 months. This was relatively common before 1978, then didn't happen even once until 1992.

The table shows that the S&P struggled once the relationship turned this negative. Over the next 3 months, the index rose only 27% of the time, suffered a negative median return, and had risk that was well above reward. It was much more likely to show a big drop than a big rise over that time frame. See this Knowledge Base article for more details on what the terms in the table represent.

Bulls might seize on that last signal, which proved to be the biggest exception of them all. We tend to place more weight on recent occurrences, so this is a modest knock against relying too much on the negative implications.

For bond yields, the path forward was mostly lower. That's not a big surprise since the trend in yields was down over much of the study period.

GOOD FOR FINANCIALS, BAD FOR TECH

Among sectors and factors, REITS and Financials tended to rank among the best places to be, while Discretionary and Technology stocks were among the worst.

Instead of looking at median returns as the above table shows, the one below shows the percentage of time each sector and factor showed a positive return. Financials showed a positive return 60% of the time over the next 3 months, while Discretionary stocks only had a 27% win rate.

RISK PARITY SHOWED GOOD LONG-TERM RETURNS

As Bloomberg noted about this correlation between stocks and bonds:

"Bond declines tend to raise more alarm for risk-parity strategies, which typically have higher-than-average allocations to debt owing to its lower volatility. In this view, the selloff in Treasuries this year has been especially concerning because it signals investors are demanding higher yields after a decade of falling rates." - Bloomberg

When we look at an appended index of risk parity strategies from Salient and Advanced Research, medium-term returns were mixed. There were a couple of losses, a couple of gains, and a non-event. But over the next 6-12 months, risk parity rebounded every time.

Since both stocks and bond yields tended to decline over the medium-term, this deep negative correlation between stocks and yields suggests that investors would have benefited toward tilting their portfolios more toward bonds. Granted, this is relying on historical relationships, but at least it includes periods prior to the generational peak in yields in 1982.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2025 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.