Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

What I'm looking at - ISM, Hindenburg Omen, oil, semiconductors, China

Troy Bombardia
2020-02-04

Here's what I'm looking at:


ISM Manufacturing PMI

Bears focused heavily on manufacturing data over the past few months to support their case, often citing the weak ISM manufacturing PMI. But for the first time in 5 months, the ISM manufacturing PMI is above 50 (i.e. no longer in contraction).

When the ISM Manufacturing PMI rose above 50 for the first time in at least 5 months, the S&P's 3-12 month forward returns leaned bullish:

Most of the bearish cases, particularly the major bearish cases (see 2002 and 2008) occurred when the stock market was significantly below its all-time highs. So if we isolate for the cases in which the S&P was within 10% of a 1 year high...

The S&P's 3-12 month forward returns become more bullish. Overall, there is no significant U.S. economic deterioration right now.


Clusters of Hindenburg Omen signals

Jason and I have looked at the Hindenburg Omen in recent weeks. While these signals failed last November, thusfar they have been accurate. 4 Hindenburg Omen signals have been triggered on the NYSE and 2 Hindenburg Omen signals have been triggered on the NASDAQ:

Let's combine the # of signals on both exchanges:

The following table illustrates what happened next to the S&P 500 when at least 6 combined Hindenburg Omen signals were triggered in the past 6 days:

Here's what happened next to the NASDAQ Composite:

Overall, this is a short term bearish factor for U.S. equities over the next few months.


Oil crushed

Coronavirus fears have crushed commodities: copper is down a record number of days in a row, the CRB Index has fallen -10% of the past 20 sessions, and oil has fallen 15 of the past 19 days:

All of these "crazy selling" extremes would lead one to think that commodities are overdue for a bounce. While a bounce is indeed "inevitable" (things are always inevitable if you wait long enough), the important question is "when". When oil fell at least 15 of the past 19 days, its forward returns were not consistently bullish:

On the positive side, this was quite bullish for the U.S. stock market over the next year, since intense selling in commodities often occurs with global economic fears:


Semiconductors

The Semiconductor Index is taking a break after leading the stock market's rally over the past half year. It has fallen below its 50 dma for the first time in >70 days (i.e. a pause after strong momentum).

When the Semiconductor Index witnessed a long streak of strong momentum and then made a pullback, it had a strong tendency to rally more over the next 2 months:

As did the S&P 500...


Chinese selloff

And finally, yesterday's selloff in Chinese equities was extreme (which was to be expected, given all the negative news). Here's an aggregate chart which combines the "% of members below their lower Bollinger Bands", the "% of members with RSI < 30", and the "% of members at new 52 week lows". As I said, quite extreme:

When the selling this was intense in the past, the Shanghai Index usually faced more weakness in the weeks and months ahead:

Of these 3 breadth indicators, the most extreme is the "% of members below their lower Bollinger Bands". Such extreme selling (by this measure at least) has only been witnessed 2 other times from 2002-present:

Once again, such extreme selling has not been good for the Shanghai Index over the next few weeks/months:


My trading portfolio

My trading portfolio is allocated 50% in the Macro Index Model and 50% in the Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals. At the moment I have instituted a discretionary override and gone 100% long bonds (instead of long stocks) due to the extreme nature of many of our core indicators, even though some of these core indicators aren't in the models.

Performance YTD 2020:

  1. My trading account is up 1.84%
  2. Currently 100% in bonds

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2025 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.