Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

What I'm looking at - Housing Starts, CFO's pessimism, ZEW, FedEx crash

Troy Bombardia
2019-09-19
null

The stock market remains near an all-time high after the Fed cut rates. Personally, I wouldn't spend too much time thinking about how the Fed's actions will impact the stock market. Plenty of people try to guess, and when you add up their successes + failures you realize that their guess isn't much better than a 50/50 bet. Overall, follow the data and don't trade the news. Here's what I'm looking at:


Housing

As I said on Tuesday, housing weakness was a key contributor to the Macro Index's bearishness in late-2018. But various housing indicators are starting to improve, starting with the NAHB Housing Market Index and now Housing Starts. After trending sideways for a year, Housing Starts has finally made a new high for this economic expansion. 

This is very important, because housing indicators are some of the most consistent leading indicators for the U.S. economy. Plenty of academic papers have examined the leading nature of housing, and some have even declared that "housing IS the U.S. economy". In the past, housing indicators such as Housing Starts typically trended sideways before bear markets and recessions began. The new high in Housing Starts is encouraging for this economic expansion and bull market.

Now let's assume a worst case scenario. Let's assume that the latest reading (for the month of August 2019) will be the high for Housing Starts in this economic expansion. 

When Housing Starts peaked in each economic expansion, the S&P typically continued to rally over the next year. Hence why this is a leading indicator.

What surprises me about the resurgence in housing is that Bill McBride from Calculated Risk seems to be right. Back in 2018 when housing indicators were trending downwards, Bill said that he didn't think a recession would happen until 2021 because he didn't think housing would peak until 2021. This was a bold call at the time, because the consensus was RECESSION INCOMINGGGGG. And Bill has an amazing track record. He called the 2007 housing crash, called the 2012 housing bottom, and seems to be on track so far.

Personally, I don't like to guess economic data because most guesses are no better than a 50/50 coin toss. But if I had to trust one economist with my money, it certainly would be Bill. (Also he has nothing to sell, so there is an honesty factor).

*This is not a paid endorsement. Just a fan of his work.

Overall, the resurgence in housing (if this continues) is good for macro.


CFO's pessimism

As CNBC noted, "a survey of 225 chief financial officers by Duke University shows pessimism on the U.S. economy has been growing steadily this year ".

This is due to a global slowdown in growth (particularly outside the U.S.), combined with Trump's ongoing trade war. 

The following charts illustrate what % of CFO's are more optimistic about the U.S. economy, and what % of CFO's are more pessimistic about the U.S. economy. 

The next chart looks at the Optimism - Pessimism spread

Overall, CFO's tend to become more pessimistic whenever global growth slows down (e.g. 2007-2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2015, now). However, their concerns aren't always accurate because many "growth slowdowns" don't turn into full-blown recessions and bear markets.

The following chart illustrates what happened next to the S&P after the % of CFO's who are more optimistic on the U.S. economy falls below 15%:

The next chart illustrates what happened next to the S&P after the % of CFO's who are more pessimistic on the U.S. economy rises above 45%:

And lastly, the next table looks at what happened next to the S&P when the Optimism - Pessimism spread falls below -30%:

Overall, I wouldn't be too concerned about the fact that CFO's are turning pessimistic. Their concerns are a reflection of what we already know: global growth slowdown + trade war.


Germany ZEW

The Germany ZEW survey is a popular sentiment survey that asks analysts from banks, insurance companies, and industrial enterprises what they think about the German economy. And right now, Germany's ZEW Current Conditions has fallen to the "lowest level since 2008" (insert scary music).

Except it hasn't always been that scary. When this happened in 2008, it occurred towards the end of the bear market and the worst of the recession. Before that, it wasn't a consistent long term bearish factor (1+ years) for the German stock market, although there was weakness over the next 3-6 months.

*Sample size is a bit small, but sentiment surveys seem to be quite useful for understanding the German economy. I follow Ifo and ZEW for the German economy.

Here's what happened next to the S&P 500.


Fedex

And lastly, FedEx crashed more than 12% yesterday. Pundits are quick to point out that "this is the worst one day crash since 2008", thereby implicitly connecting today with 2008 ("it's 2008 all over again")

*FedEx crashed on its earnings report.

Except the biggest one day FedEx crashes usually occurred towards the end of a bear market, not the beginning. 

Here's what happened next to FedEx:

Overall, I don't think it makes much sense to use 1 company's stock price to predict the broad U.S. stock market or economy. This reminds of popular tweets last year that went along the lines of:

  1. GE is crashing right now. The last time GE crashed was 2008. I guess it's 2008 all over again!
  2. Sotheby's is crashing right now. The last time Sotheby's crashed was 2008. I guess it's 2008 all over again!


Conclusion

From my weekend market overview:

  1. Long term risk:reward doesn’t favor bulls. Valuations are high, but valuations can remain high for years.
  2. Fundamentals (6-12 months): still bullish because there is no significant U.S. macro deterioration, but this could change IF macro data deteriorates significantly over the next few months
  3. Technicals (3-6 months): mostly bullish
  4. Technicals (1-2 months): no clear edge in either direction

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2025 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.