Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Weekly reversals tend to lead to FOMO

Jason Goepfert
2024-09-16
FOMO is a real phenomenon, and it looks likely to trigger investors soon. The S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Russell 2000 all reversed large weekly losses while trading near 52-week highs. When the indices behaved like this, investors showed a consistent tendency to bid prices higher in the months ahead.

Key points:

  • The S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Russell 2000 reversed significant weekly losses from the prior week
  • These reversals occurred while the indices were trading near 52-week highs
  • Similar behavior, especially when it triggers across indices, has consistently preceded further gains

Triggering the Fear Of Missing Out

It would be unfair to blame investors for suffering whiplash after the last couple of weeks. That whiplash has a good chance of morphing into FOMO.

The S&P 500, the most benchmarked index in the world, fell more than -4% a week ago, then nearly made up that entire loss a week later. All while trading within spitting distance of a record high.

The only times this has happened in nearly a decade were during the post-pandemic recovery. Both preceded further gains.

Since the index became a 500-stock index nearly 70 years ago, it has undergone similar weekly reversals only a handful of times. The reversals triggered buyers to step up their game each time, and the index enjoyed more gains over the next 2-6 months. Six months later, the S&P was up by double digits four of the five times.

The lack of meaningful selling pressure is especially notable among the signals. The table of maximum gains and losses shows that within the following six months, only one signal suffered more than a -5% pullback.

We will be dealing with tiny sample sizes with behavior like this, but if we expand the reversals to include those within 3% of a 52-week high in the S&P 500, then at least we get double the number of signals. The conclusion remains mostly the same, with a consistent win record over the medium- to long-term. There was only one, in 2014, that preceded any kind of substantial selling across any time frame. It was the only one with more than a -10% drawdown within the following year.

Not just the S&P

The Nasdaq Composite also underwent a significant weekly reversal. The index is more volatile than the S&P 500, so we'll look at +/-3% reversals within 10% of a 52-week high in the index. Over the next six months, the only actual failures were the signals that were triggered near the peak of the internet bubble.

The small-cap Russell 2000 also nearly reversed its previous weekly loss while hovering within pullback territory. That index had less success in pulling in buyers who fretted they were missing out.

When we combine all three indexes and look for significant weekly reversals across all three during the same week, there were only three precedents. The S&P 500 was up by double-digits each time over the next six months.

Again, with the small sample size, it pays to relax the parameters. So, the table below shows weekly reversals in the S&P 500 along with either the Nasdaq Composite or the Russell 2000. Stocks suffered significant losses into early 2016, but those were quickly erased and overall returns were impressive.

What the research tells us...

The fear of missing out is a natural phenomenon. A significant weekly price reversal isn't necessarily enough to trigger the condition, but it most often is when it occurs near a price extreme. "Most often" is probably too weak of a qualifier - "almost without exception" would be more appropriate.

When the most important index in the world almost wholly reverses a meaningful loss that occurs near the highest price in months, investors have shown a consistent tendency to believe the worst is behind them and raise their bids. With few exceptions and possibly none (depending on your definition), price action, as we've seen over the past couple of weeks, has preceded ever-higher prices in the months ahead.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.