Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Tuesday Color - Overseas Rebound, Sector Recoveries, HY vs IG Spreads, VIX Drop

Jason Goepfert
2019-08-20
null

Here's what's piquing my interest as stocks gyrate in what is likely going to be a pattern of low (and lower) volume in the days ahead.

Overseas Rebound

In the Hang Seng index of Hong Kong stocks, 90% of them have jumped enough to trade above the 10-day averages. That has preceded some short-term exhaustion lately.

But it's worth noting the context. That figure was under 5% within the past week, and more than half the stocks are still trading below their 200-day averages. This suggests a short-term thrust within a longer-term downtrend.

When this happened before, it indicated the early stages of longer-term recoveries.

There has been a similar, though less dramatic, recovery on the Shanghai.

Its results have been less impressive. Like we've often seen, the Shanghai trades differently than just about any other major index in the world. It doesn't obey the same kinds of behavioral norms.

Emerging markets are trying to recover as well, after the McClellan Oscillator dropped to a record low a couple of weeks ago. It's still not above the zero line, however.

Technically, the index is emerging from an oversold condition, with the RSI for the MSCI Emerging Markets Index rising above 30 for the first time in weeks, after dropping below 20.

The folks at Daily Wealth note that this has been a positive for the EEM fund in recent years. Longer-term, the record is more mixed. A year later the index was higher all but three times...but those three losses were all larger than -20%.

U.S. Sectors

Among U.S. sectors, the preference for defensive stocks pushed more than 20% of consumer staples to new 52-week highs. While that hasn't been a signal of exhaustion, returns up to the next three months were well below random.

Over the past few years, only the reading in April of this year led to meaningful sustained gains. Otherwise staples' returns up to the next month tended to be either negative or barely positive.

Financials are trying to reverse what had been some negative momentum underlying the sector. The McClellan Oscillator has turned positive after more than two weeks in negative territory, including a reading below -100, even while longer-term momentum was positive with the Summation Index well above zero.

This was mostly a great all-clear sign from 2013-2015, but not so much otherwise. Need to watch this in case the Oscillator dives back below zero, which would not be good.

The same thing is happening in tech stocks.

This has been a much better sign.

Mostly a good sign for the broader S&P 500 index, as well. A year later, only one small loss.

Spread Blowout

The WSJ notes that high-yield bonds have been greatly underperforming investment-grade ones relative to Treasuries. This is often taken as a caution sign that some of the most economically-sensitive investors in the market (in high-yield bonds) are pulling back on their risk exposure.

That has been the case, as investment-grade bond spreads are in the bottom 40% of the range they've been in for the past year, while high-yield spreads are in the upper 80% of their range.

The argument that this is a major worry for stocks seems sound, as bond investors are usually considered the "smart money." But if we look at other times this has happened - when the spread in the 1-year range between the two has blown out like it has recently - it's not conclusive.

These investors were sounding early alarms during the 2001 recession, so a point in their favor. They were "early" if we want to call it that in 2005, and stocks did great for 2 more years. In 2014, stocks continued to rise for months, before ultimately rolling over. Whether to call that a success or failure is up for interpretation.

Overall? Doesn't seem like an imminent and consistent reason to worry.

Returning To Normal

Bloomberg notes that traders' anxiety levels are starting to calm, with the VIX "fear gauge" falling back below its 20-day average.

Opportunistic traders often like to buy when the VIX first spikes, with the knowledge that extreme can always get more extreme. More conservative ones prefer to wait until things show some sign of settling back, like now.

For the most part, this wasn't a bad strategy. When the VIX first fell back below its 20-day average for the first time in weeks, and it hadn't been above 25 for at least the past couple of weeks, stocks typically rose afterward. 

Of the 33 signals, the S&P lost more than -5% at some point over the next 3 months 7 times, while gaining more than +5% at some point 16 times, so a decent risk/reward setup.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.