Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Tightest Cluster Of Small-Cap Weakness Since '99

Jason Goepfert
2019-07-24
null

A large “small” divergence

Over the past 30 days, there have now been 6 sessions when the S&P 500 was at or near a 52-week high, but the ratio of the small-cap Russell 2000 index to the S&P sunk to a 52-week low. That’s the tightest cluster of days since April 1999.

Large, rounded peaks in the ratio have almost universally preceded trouble in the broader market, very roughly preceding the declines in 1987, 1990, 2000, 2007, and 2015.

Lack of traction

The S&P 500 took a breather over the past week or so, at least until Tuesday’s jump. It didn’t decline much, but the choppiness was enough that most stocks in the index fell below their short-term moving averages, and suspiciously few of them managed to keep making 52-week highs.

For a day when the S&P was within spitting distance of a new high, it's highly unusual to see so few of its stocks trading above their 10-day moving average.

Going forward, the S&P’s returns were below random on all time frames, and the risk/reward was negatively skewed, especially over the next three months.

Watch Mexico

Among all sectors and indexes we follow, the most extreme readings in breadth or sentiment are in the Mexbol index of Mexican stocks. Recent sessions have triggered a number of extremes, and further weakness on Tuesday likely furthered those extremes. The market is getting very close to “puke” levels of panic.

Watch for icebergs

We’ve focused a lot on a split in the market which has developed in recent days. Now 4 of the past 5 sessions on the Nasdaq have triggered a Titanic Syndrome, a new high in the Composite followed quickly by more 52-week lows than highs on the exchange. Per the Backtest Engine, a 5-day average of 0.8 or above (meaning at least 4 of the last 5 days) has triggered on 95 days, after which the Composite rose during the next 2 weeks only 31 times.

This post was an abridged version of our previous day's Daily Report. For full access, sign up for a 30-day free trial now.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.