Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

The Risk-Off Composite Model triggered a warning

Dean Christians
2024-05-31
A trading model that detects a divergence between the S&P 500's price trend and a breadth composite generated an alert, contributing to a broad warning for the Risk-Off Composite Model. Similar precedents have often preceded a multi-month period of turbulence for the S&P 500, with most of the risk in the initial weeks.

Key points:

  • A component in the Risk-Off Composite Model that identifies a breadth divergence issued an alert 
  • Similar divergences suggest the S&P 500 could struggle over the following two months
  • With a third component alert, the Risk-Off Composite Model triggered a warning  

A breadth divergence indicates a discrepancy between the index trend and internal strength

On Thursday, a voting member in the Risk-Off Composite Model issued a new alert. This component identifies discrepancies between the S&P 500's trend and a breadth composite, highlighting periods when internal and external trends are out of sync or diverging. The composite combines the spread between 52-week highs and lows with the percentage of issues trading above their 200-day average for S&P 500 members, reflecting long-term participation trends.  

With the new component signal, the Risk-Off Composite Model triggered its first alert since December 2021. Although the S&P 500 rose to a marginal new high following that warning, investors who dismissed the risk faced harsh consequences during the severe bear market of 2022.

Should we rush to sell all our stocks in response to this warning? Absolutely not. However, it's crucial to recognize that the market environment has shifted. The period of easy gains, where all stocks rose in unison since last October, is likely over for now. This change underscores the need for effective risk management.

Breadth composite divergences preceded negative returns

Following a breadth composite divergence warning, the world's most benchmarked index tended to struggle over the subsequent two months. That was especially the case in the first few weeks, with the S&P 500 declining 72% of the time in both the one- and two-week periods. Over the first three months, the median maximum loss exceeded the maximum gain in each time frame. 

Once the corrective phase ended, the S&P 500 rallied over longer horizons, displaying returns and win rates that exceeded or matched random results over the study period.

The weight of the evidence tilts to the bearish side

The Risk-Off Composite Model signal count increased to 60%, triggering the 20th warning since 1955.

Whenever the Risk-Off Composite Model triggered a warning, the S&P 500 struggled over the subsequent two months, with the greatest risk of a selloff occurring in the first two weeks. Over that horizon, the world's most benchmarked index declined 79% of the time. Like the divergence model, the median maximum loss exceeded the maximum gain in each horizon throughout the initial three months.

The case against a significant correction

Estimating the magnitude of a market correction is challenging. It can be subtle over time due to sector rotation or more profound via a downside price adjustment. 

With a TCTM Composite Risk Warning Model signal count of 10%, the current Risk-Off Composite Model alert lacks the supporting evidence observed during the previous warning in December 2021. In contrast, the big-picture RWM exhibited a substantially higher signal count of 40% during that period, reaching 50% in January 2022, which triggered a signal. So, the case for a significant drawdown seems unlikely. 


What the research tells us...

A trading model that detects a divergence between the S&P 500's price trend and a breadth composite generated an alert, contributing to a broad warning for the Risk-Off Composite Model. Similar precedents for both models have often preceded a multi-month period of turbulence for the S&P 500, with most of the risk in the initial weeks. While it's impossible to forecast the magnitude or duration of market corrections, the TCTM Composite Risk Warning Model signal count suggests a significant drawdown is unlikely. As risks escalate, investors must remain vigilant in their approach to risk management.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.