Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

The interest rate/commodity relationship that hides in plain sight - Part II

Jay Kaeppel
2024-08-09
In Part I, we learned that interest rates do appear to influence the overall trend of commodities as an asset class. In Part II, we look at the potential for using commodity-based ETFs to gain exposure to commodities as an asset class.

Key points

  • In Part I, we revealed an interesting relationship between (very short-term) interest rate trends and the trend of commodities as an asset class
  • In Part II, we will look at using commodity ETFs to utilize what was covered in Part I

A quick review of interest rates versus commodities

For testing purposes, we used two indexes.

  • Starting in 1960, we used the Bloomberg Commodity Spot Price Index (ticker BCOMSP), representing a basket of commodities and a useful proxy for commodities as an asset class. Before 1960, we used monthly changes in the Bloomberg Commodity Index (ticker BCOM), which tracks the prices of a basket of commodity futures contracts
  • To track interest rates, we looked at the month-end value for ticker TNX, which tracks the 10-year treasury note yield

Starting in 1933, we looked at the end of each month to see if TNX was above or below its 1.3-month exponential moving average. If above, the next months were deemed "favorable" for commodities, and vice versa. Currently, the indicator is "unfavorable," as TNX closed below its 1.3-month EMA at the end of June and again at the end of July.

The chart below displays the hypothetical growth of $1 invested in the Bloomberg Commodity Spot Index only during "favorable" months on a logarithmic scale.

The hypothetical gain for September 1933 through July 2024 is +17,450%. 

The chart below displays the hypothetical growth of $1 invested in the Bloomberg Commodity Spot Index only during "unfavorable" months on a logarithmic scale.

The hypothetical loss from holding BCOMSP only during unfavorable periods for the TNX indicator from September 1933 through July 2024 is -44%.

Now, let's look at applying this method to real-world trading.

Commodity ETFs offer exposure to a basket of commodities

There are now many commodity-related ETFs that track a basket of commodities. Two that purport to track the Bloomberg Commodity Index are iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (ticker DJP) and the abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (ticker BCI). However, these funds are both relatively thinly traded (an average of 89,000 and 230,000 shares traded per day)

Two more heavily traded options include the Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (ticker PDBC) and the Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (ticker DBC). The average daily volume for the four funds listed and their respective expense ratios appear in the table below.

For trading purposes, ticker PDBC has a lower expense ratio and higher trading volume and does not issue a K-1 for tax purposes. However, for testing purposes, we will use ticker DBC, which has the longest history, starting in March 2006.

Testing the TNX indicator using a commodity ETF

It is not necessarily recommended that the method detailed in Part I be used as a standalone investment strategy. However, we are going to do so here for illustrative purposes. Starting in March 2006:

  • If TNX - 1.3-month EMA > 0 at the end of this month, we hold ticker DBC for the entirety of the following month
  • If TNX - 1.3-month EMA <=0, then we will be flat with no position

The chart below displays the hypothetical growth of $1 invested in DBC only during favorable months. The good news is that the cumulative % gain is +163.5%. The bad news is that there was a significant drawdown along the way. Still, suppose we are looking for an "edge" in commodities (rather than relying solely on this indicator as a standalone trading model). These results look quite useful compared to DBC performance when the TNX indicator is unfavorable.

The chart below displays the hypothetical growth of $1 invested in DBC only during unfavorable months. The cumulative % loss is (-57.4%).

The chart below displays both data series above on one chart for comparative purposes.

The bottom line: Holding a commodity ETF when the TNX indicator is favorable does not guarantee profits nor eliminate the risk of significant drawdowns. That said, the probability of commodity prices rising is much higher if the TNX indicator is favorable versus unfavorable.

What the research tells us…

Price movements in individual physical commodities are primarily a function of current supply and demand. However, certain seasonal factors can influence individual commodities, and extreme trends in inflation can also have an outsized effect on the overall trend of commodities as an asset class. Changes in interest rates appear to be a secondary influence and, thus, should likely not be used as a standalone method for trading commodities. That said, the probability of commodity prices rising is much higher if the TNX indicator is favorable versus unfavorable.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.