Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

The end of optimism

Jason Goepfert
2025-01-08
The average stock has been struggling in recent weeks, and that has weighed heavily on sentiment. For the first time in more than 90 days, the "dumb money" is less confident in a rally than the "smart money." After similar behavior during the past 25 years, stocks tended to rally over the following six months.

Key points:

  • Smart Money investors are now betting on a rally more than Dumb Money investors
  • This is the first time we've seen this sentiment shift in more than 90 days, one of the longest streaks since 1998
  • After similar behavior, stocks did well over the next six months, especially the Nasdaq 100

Sentiment has shifted drastically

Sentiment is the least optimistic it's been in a while.

At around 40%, Dumb Money Confidence is around its lowest level in two years. And for the first time in months, more than half of "smart money" indicators are banking on higher stock prices while less than half of "dumb money" ones are.

The shift in sentiment has moved the Smart Money / Dumb Money Confidence Spread above the zero line for the first time in more than 90 sessions. The chart below shows that when the spread is positive, the S&P 500 has returned an annualized +15.4% versus only +4.6% when the spread is negative. When this was triggered last April, the S&P 500 fell a bit more, then soon headed to new highs.

The end of the streak of at least 90 days with a negative spread was one of the longest since we began computing these models in 1998. In those 27 years, there have been 13 streaks of 90 or more days with a negative spread.

Good six-month returns for stocks

The table below shows returns in SPY after the end of a streak of at least 90 days with a negative spread. Short-term returns were mixed, with a horrid loss during the 2020 pandemic and a smattering of other minor losses. However, they tended to reverse in the months ahead - six months later, there was only one small loss, which was more than erased in the months afterward.

Below is a table showing maximum gains and losses across time frames. There are a lot of numbers, but the bottom line is that within the following six months, there were only two drawdowns larger than -6.5% compared to ten rallies of at least +6.5%. 

If we look at the other major U.S. equity ETFs after these signals, the best performer was QQQ, which tracks the large technology stocks in the Nasdaq 100. Thanks to a tremendous tailwind over the past two decades, the fund showed a median gain of +7.5% over the next six months with a single small loss. Its risk/reward ratio was tilted heavily toward "reward."

The DIA fund, focused on the venerable Dow Jones Industrial Average, suffered a couple of small losses over the next six months, both of which were aggressively erased in the months afterward. It enjoyed only two double-digit gains six months later, but that's generally the tradeoff for what could be considered a more conservative index.

The small-cap Russell 2000 fund, IWM, didn't fare as well, especially over shorter time frames. Over the next six months, it suffered a couple of losses, only one of which was meaningful, but its median return was an unimpressive +2.2%.

If you run this test on Backtest Engine 2.0 (click here, then click the Run Backtest button), you can view the Major Sectors tab and see how the S&P's primary sectors performed after the signals. Even though the big tech stocks that dominate the Nasdaq 100 did exceptionally well, the broader information technology sector was mediocre. Interestingly, the most consistent winners over the next several months were health care, consumer staples, and utilities - the most defensive sectors.

What the research tells us...

Sentiment has shifted to one of the most significant degrees in months. Even though the S&P 500, dominated by the largest stocks, has held up well, the average stock has been struggling to a surprising degree. That has weighed on sentiment, and most of the core measures we follow are now back to neutral, at least.

When the spread between Smart and Dumb Money Confidence climbs above zero after months below, it tells us that investors have reset their expectations after a prolonged period of optimism. That might seem like catnip for bears, and sometimes it was on shorter time frames, but momentum (and optimism) don't tend to be easily extinguished. After similar stretches, stocks showed a strong tendency to do well over the next six months.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.