Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

The average stock just enjoyed a near-record reversal

Jason Goepfert
2023-12-19
While the Magnificent 7 stocks get all the attention, the average S&P 500 stock has been doing very well. The S&P 500 equal weight index just cycled from a 52-week low to a 52-week high in only 33 days, the 2nd-shortest cycle since 1957. Other times the index went from a low to a high, it continued to gain over the next 6 months every time.

Key points:

  • There is an intense focus on the Magnificent 7 stocks, but the average stock is also doing quite well
  • The S&P 500 equal weight index just cycled from a 52-week low to a 52-week high in only 33 days
  • Other times the index cycled from low to high, it added on more gains over the next 6 months every time

"But it's just 7 stocks!"

We're all probably tired of reading about it. Hearing about it. Seeing it. Anyone with even a casual interest in finance has been inundated with the idea that this year has been dominated by only seven stocks.

It's an interesting narrative with a catchy name, and that's all it takes for financial media anymore. The trouble for investors with real money at stake is that it is misleading; just because those seven stocks have done well, it doesn't mean that other stocks haven't done well.

The fact is that the average stock in the S&P 500 has just cycled from a 52-week low to a 52-week high in barely more than a calendar month. That's an almost unprecedented success.

The S&P 500 equal weight index gives the same weight to all 500+ stocks, as opposed to the capitalization weight index that is cited everywhere and that weights larger stocks more heavily. 

The equal weight index just went from a 52-week low to a 52-week high in 33 trading days. The only low-to-high cycle that happened faster was at the best bottom of all time, in September 1982.

Low-to-high cycles have a strong tendency to lead to more gains

The table below shows every time the equal weight index cycled from a 52-week low to a 52-week high, regardless of how long it took. And it was a good sign for the average stock, which added to its gains over the next six months every time. 

After these signals, the index suffered more than a -10% drawdown within the next six months only once, which is remarkable. The median drawdown was a minuscule -1.8%, while the median drawup (maximum gain) was nearly +13%.

The capitalization weight version of the index also did well after the average stock cycled from a low to a high. However, it suffered one loss over the next six months as the internet bubble burst and some big tech companies dragged the index lower.

If it weren't for the pandemic in 2020, the quickest low-to-high cycles would have a perfect one-year record of gains. As it stands, the few times the equal weight index took 90 days or fewer to cycle to a new high ended up leading to 3-6 month rallies each time, with a ridiculously positive risk-to-reward ratio.

These quick cycles also proved to be good medium-term signs for the mainstream version of the index, though not without some indigestion in the shorter term.

What the research tells us...

More than ever, mainstream financial media is held hostage by editors who want web traffic for advertisers, SEO bait for search engines, and a get-it-published-first mentality for social media. That has dramatically degraded the quality of market coverage for individual investors who rely on these sources. What's published now is little more than me-too articles that provide little context and even less insight.

The fortunate by-product of this is that investors who can think for themselves and do independent research have opportunities to take advantage of the zeitgeist when it overlooks the boring stuff. And right now, the boring stuff includes the fact that the average stock has been doing quite well, has reversed quickly from a bad stretch in the fall, and similar behavior has shown a powerful tendency to lead to further gains over the next six months.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.