Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

PortfolioEdge Update for Feb 10

Jason Goepfert
2023-02-10
Over the past few months, we've seen a historic recovery across stocks, sectors, indexes, exchanges, asset classes, and even entire countries. The type of thrust we've witnessed tend to occur at the ends of bear markets, not during them.

Key points:

  • The recovery in stocks has continued to a historic degree
  • Thrusts like this across indexes, sectors, exchanges, assets, and countries are typically seen at the beginnings of new bull markets
  • Bonds have recovered as well but with much less investor optimism, while gold may struggle after a recent surge

Commentary

Sometimes, it's just better to sit on one's hands. This is precisely what I've been doing for a few months, and have been comfortable doing so. The trouble is, whenever investing feels comfortable, it can quickly morph into complacency.

That attitude is especially dangerous during bear markets. And that's the great argument right now, whether we're still actually mired in a bear market. In December, we looked at several factors arguing that we weren't. The case has only gotten stronger since then.

After plunging to one of the worst levels in 30 years, the market's internal momentum has completely reversed. For the first time in two years, the NYSE version of the Summation Index has crossed above +1,000 after declining below -1,000 last fall.

As we outlined with several other studies, like renewed long-term uptrends among sectors and industries, these readings are not seen during ongoing bear markets. It did not happen during the last two bears or any before them. 

The S&P 500's returns following cycles in the Summation Index from below -1,000 to above +1,000 were pristine. There was a single tiny loss three or six months later, but all showed a positive return over the following year. 

The most significant drawdown among any signal within the next year was a modest -6.8%. At the same time, every signal saw a rally of at least +11.4%. 

It's not just securities on the NYSE that have recovered. The Nasdaq McClellan Summation Index has similarly cycled from an extreme low to extreme high. Even more notably, we can see the same behavior in the Summation Indexes in the French CAC, German DAX, UK FTSE, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng.

The biggest worry among contrarians right now is a high level of optimism across indicators. There are some exceptions (there always are), but there is little denying that, overall, investors have turned quite optimistic.

Early last October, Dumb Money (mostly trend-followers) was selling ferociously, while Smart Money (mostly corporate insiders and institutional traders) was buying. Since then, a persistent and remarkably broad-based rally in financial assets has dramatically shifted sentiment. The Spread between Dumb Money and Smart Money confidence in a further rally has fully cycled from one extreme to the other.

Sentiment works differently in bull and bear markets. We can see in the chart above that the S&P's annualized return is better at the extremes than it is when sentiment is in the mushy middle. Since we began computing this in 1998, whenever the Spread was below -0.5, the S&P 500 was positive over the next year 93% of the time, averaging 12.3%.

Perhaps the best way to look at this is by comparing it to other sentiment cycles. These are times when the Spread cycled from above +0.5 to below -0.5, from deep pessimism to high optimism. Over the next six months, the S&P showed a positive return after 9 of the 12 cycles. What seems notable is that the three outright failures all failed immediately. While a negative return over the next 1-2 weeks did not guarantee a negative long-term return, a negative long-term return was precipitated by a negative short-term return each time. The reaction so far has not been good, so that is a modest concern.

We have spent a lot of time on the research side looking at other technical recoveries. The evidence is overwhelming, and it is broad. Even going back to the 1930s, it has been exceptionally rare - if not downright unprecedented - to see readings like we have recently during any kind of protracted bear market.

Portfolio updates

STOCKS

S&P 500 Equal-Weight (RSP) - I see little reason to adjust exposure here. The signs of recovery we've witnessed over the past few months have a high probability of only occurring after the end of the worst of the selling pressure during bear markets. Small-cap stocks have a tendency to show higher average returns following these signals, so I continue to favor the equal-weight version of the S&P 500 index over the traditional cap-weighted version.

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets (IEMG) - My reasoning for having a positive outlook on emerging markets has not changed much, even after a 25%+ rally off the lows. We have seen similar recoveries within these markets as we have for domestic ones, and those tend to precede even higher prices over the next 6-12 months. Signals tend to be less consistent in these markets, but they still point to a compelling medium- to long-term bullish view.

BONDS

Vanguard Total Bond (BND) - After a record bad year in 2022, bonds have stormed out of the gate. The argument for adding exposure here is significantly less compelling than it was last October, so for now I'm okay with just letting it ride. I've seen few signs so far that the rally has generated the kinds of sentiment extremes that would cause me to reduce exposure. In fact, our Bond Optimism Index just fell to another very low reading despite a relatively modest pullback in prices.

iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond (HYG) - Junk continues to be a beneficiary of improved risk-on sentiment. I continue to like having a modest amount of exposure here, for the yield as well as potential price gains over the longer-term.

PRECIOUS METALS

VanEck Gold Miners (GDX) - Gold miners staged a ferocious rally over the past few months, and recently hit overbought extremes. In our research, we found that the sector has had great difficulty holding upside momentum like it recently generated, so it wouldn't be surprising to see further choppiness at best.

COMMODITIES

WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy (GCC) - I'm not seeing anything especially compelling here, so holding for now.

SPECIAL SITUATIONS

KraneShares CSI China Internet (KWEB) - After suffering some of the worst losses of any sector in any market ever heading into the fall of 2022, investors have rediscovered the opportunity here. Unfortunately, the bandwagon-jumping reached a near-fever pitch a few weeks ago, and the shares have understandably taken a breather. If history is any guide whatsoever, then these stocks will likely see high volatility, but for all the reasons outlined over the past year, I continue to favor them over a long time frame.

SPDR S&P Biotech (XBI) - This fund broke out of a modest consolidation pattern last month and made a little run before pulling back again. While not nearly as compelling as some other sector bets like Chinese tech, the long-term outlook appears positive due to a reversion from some of the historic pessimism we outlined last year. I'm willing to let it ride.

Portfolio Summary and Disclaimers

RETURN YTD:  +4.5%

2022: -5.5%,  2021: +8.7%,  2020: +8.1%, 2019: +12.6%, 2018: +0.6%, 2017: +3.8%, 2016: +17.1%, 2015: +9.2%, 2014: +14.5%, 2013: +2.2%, 2012: +10.8%, 2011: +16.5%, 2010: +15.3%, 2009: +23.9%, 2008: +16.2%, 2007: +7.8%

Not intended as investment advice. In this account, we roughly follow what has become known as the All Weather portfolio popularized by Ray Dalio. It allocates across four broad assets, designed to hold up no matter the market environment. The goal is modest positive returns while limiting large, sustained losses. We typically use popular ETFs with low costs. At times, we will swap out for a fund we believe has better prospects or simply lower fees if not. At other times, we will diverge quite a bit from baseline allocations, largely depending on the indicators and studies we discuss on the site. The base allocation includes stocks (35%), bonds (35%), gold (5%%), commodities (5%) and cash/other (20%).

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.