Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

It's time to keep a (wary) eye on natural gas

Jay Kaeppel
2023-12-05
Natural gas has been pounded relentlessly since the end of October and appears to be due for a bounce. Nevertheless, seasonality suggests that traders be very wary of betting on the long side in the months ahead and look instead for an opportunity to play the short side.

Key Points

  • Natural gas has plunged in recent weeks, reaching a relatively oversold level
  • Nevertheless, this highly cyclical market is entering a period that often witnesses extreme weakness
  • Bears may look to press their bets, and bulls might look for some corroborating evidence before testing the long side

A bearish seasonal period is now upon us

Natural gas has declined -21% since the end of October. We see this decline in the chart below. 

Conventional wisdom suggests a reflex rally of some sort is due. However, the chart below displays the annual seasonal trend for natural gas futures. This market is entering a seasonally unfavorable period that extends from Trading Day of Year #236 through TDY #31 of the following year. For 2023-24, this period extends from the close on 2023-12-04 through the close on 2004-02-15.

The chart below displays the cumulative $ +(-) for holding a long position in natural gas futures only from TDY #236 through TDY #31 the following year since natural gas started trading in 1990.


Even a quick perusal of the chart above clarifies why a trader might think twice about trying to play for a bounce in natural gas - even despite its currently oversold status. While anything could happen, swimming upstream is generally a more challenging and less rewarding approach.

During this seasonal window, natural gas declined for 25 out of 33 years. Likewise, significant $5,000 or more moves have skewed to the negative side 17 times to only three times to the positive side.

Considering ETFs instead of futures contracts

Natural gas futures trading is only for very well-capitalized traders. On the other hand, ETFs can allow anyone to access the market. The United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) is designed to track the price of natural gas futures. Even more so than many other commodity-related ETFs, UNG has a nasty long-term downward bias due to persistent contango in the futures market.

The chart below displays the cumulative percentage return for holding a long position in ticker UNG only from TDY #236 through TDY #31 the following year since trading inception in 2007. Note that the cumulative loss for this period is pretty stunning at -93.6%. Repeating: Swimming upstream is not a good way to put the odds in your favor.

Out of the 16 years in its history, UNG suffered a loss during these seasonal windows 12 times, with ten losses of -10 % or more.

Aggressive traders who want to play the short side and are willing to accept a very high degree of risk and volatility might look at ticker KOLD. The ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas ETF (KOLD) is designed to track two times the inverse daily performance for natural gas futures. But make no mistake about the highly volatile and risky nature of investing in this ETF. 

For better or worse, the chart and table below display the results for holding a long position in ticker KOLD only from TDY #236 through TDY #31 the following year since trading inception in 2011. Over eleven years, the cumulative gain is +1,619%, albeit with several harrowing drawdowns interspersed.

The table below summarizes KOLD's performance during this seasonal window.

To fully illustrate the wildly volatile nature of UNG and KOLD, the table below displays the year-by-year performance for these two ETFs during the TDY #236 to TDY #31 period.

During a roughly two-and-a-half-month window, ticker KOLD has enjoyed gains of +336.5%, +89.8%, +71.8% and +50%. However, during this same seasonal window, it has also registered losses of -42.7%, -25.6%, and -18.1%. This ETF is clearly not for the faint of heart, the undercapitalized, or those inclined to take overly large positions. 

What the research tells us...

One of the keys to succeeding as a trader is focusing on putting the odds on your side to the greatest extent possible with each trade. The caveat is that even if you do this, there will be trades that end up going the wrong way. Natural gas has suffered a significant (and relatively relentless) decline since the end of October. As a result, many traders may be looking for a bounce and/or eschewing the short side of this volatile market. Nevertheless, the seasonal window highlighted above has often - though notably, not always - witnessed surprisingly sharp weakness in natural gas prices. The history suggests that traders looking to put the odds in their favor look for opportunities to play the short side of natural gas between now and mid-February 2024.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.