Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Internal momentum has reached escape velocity

Jason Goepfert
2024-01-02
Internal momentum across stocks, indexes, sectors, and even exchanges is historic. The McClellan Summation Index for the NYSE, as well as for some indexes and sectors, has reached escape velocity that never really occurs during ongoing bear markets. Forward returns after similar behavior were exceptional.

Key points:

  • The McClellan Summation Index for the NYSE has reached escape velocity, never seen during bear markets
  • The Summation Indexes across indexes and sectors are at high or even record levels
  • This type of internal momentum has rarely, if ever, preceded negative medium- to long-term returns

Buying is so broad and persistent that it's historic

We've spent much time since October 2022 discussing internal momentum across indexes and sectors. With the latest push higher, many of those metrics confirm the participation that typically precedes further gains.

The McClellan Summation Index for the NYSE has pushed above +1000 after having been severely oversold. A very high reading is typically a good sign of lasting internal momentum, as Jay noted on Friday, and the fact that it has cycled from a deeply negative reading adds to its importance.

The +1000 level was not breached during prior ongoing bear markets, only when the bear markets had run their courses. It didn't happen at any point during the 2000-02 or 2008 bear markets....

...or at all during the 1970s and early 80s bears.

When the Summation cycle turns, it has been excellent for returns

Let's go back and look at major negative-to-positive cycles in the Summation Index. The table below shows other times when the indicator cycled from below -850 to above +1000, regardless of how long it took.

After these signals, the next couple of weeks were hit-and-miss, but medium- to long-term returns were exceptional, and there were no losses over the next year.

The risk/reward table shows some of the most skewed results we've ever seen. No signal suffered more than a -6.8% drawdown at any point within the following year, yet every signal enjoyed a double-digit gain at some point.

After the shortest cycles, when momentum shifted so notably in fewer than 50 sessions, the S&P's future returns were even more impressive. Granted, the sample size is tiny, but we can have a bit more confidence in the results due to their consistency. Every one of them was triggered after a bear market had ended.

Internal momentum is robust across indexes and sectors

Scrolling through the McClellan Summation Indexes for other indexes and sectors, a remarkable number are over +1000. A handful of them are at all-time highs.

Perhaps none of these are as important as the one for the S&P 500, the most benchmarked equity index in the world. Its McClellan Summation Index has climbed above +1500 for only the 2nd time in 25 years. The other instance, in May 2013, preceded a one-month pullback and then a resumption of upside momentum.

If we go back to 1950, it's clear that what we're seeing is historic. Only two other dates reached this level, after bear markets in the 1970s.

After each of these surges, the S&P had some difficulty adding to its gains over the short term, but overall risk was relatively low up to a year later.

Obviously, it's a stretch to rely on a sample size of three. If we relax the Summation Index threshold to anything above +1250, we get more precedents and further confirmation that momentum like this is a notable signal for long-term returns. There was only one negative signal from 2018.

What the research tells us...

Since October 2022, we've detailed study after study that suggested the type of behavior we're witnessing is not something that has ever occurred during an ongoing bear market. Investors didn't want to believe it after the scars of 2022, one of the worst years for financial assets in history.

Sentiment has come a long way since then, and there are many indications that it has become overheated. Again, that does not have a chance to happen during protracted bear markets, but it does tend to indicate below-average annualized returns as buyers pull back a bit and take a breather. A multi-week pullback would be common after readings like we're seeing now. But the signs of internal momentum we've seen lately are remarkable and have rarely - if ever - preceded a significant market peak within the following year.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.