Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Institutions buy record bets on a crash

Jason Goepfert
2022-09-07
Last week, institutional traders spent a record $8 billion on protective put options. Their total spending on bearish options strategies by far exceeds any other week in 22 years. That might be a concern in the short-term, but longer-term, extremes in their option trading have been contrary indicators.

Key points:

  • The largest options traders spent a record amount on put options last week
  • Their total hedging activity is far beyond anything seen in 22 years
  • Short-term, that may be a concern, but long-term, it should be a bullish factor

Institutional traders have placed record bets on a crash

In February 2021, small speculators were going bananas. At the time, I showed what was perhaps the most remarkable chart that I'd seen in my entire career.

Until now.

This time, it's not small options traders that have panicked. And it's not FOMO that's causing it. Rather, it's the largest traders in the market, and they're buying protection against a crash at a pace unlike anything the market has ever seen.

Last week, traders of fifty or more contracts bought to open nearly five million put options. More importantly, they spent a whopping $8.1 billion on those contracts. That is almost double the amount of any other week in 22 years.

With options trading, it's essential to consider both sides. Sometimes, when there is a spike in put buying, it's because overall volume is higher, and there is a coincident spike in call buying. So, we prefer to net them out, which is what the chart below shows. It reflects the net dollar value of premiums that institutional traders spent on buying calls to open minus buying puts to open. The lower the blue line, the more they spent on puts.

There has never been anything like this in the history of the data. Whenever we see something like this, the first thought is, "Well, maybe it's a data error." And maybe it is. But this is official data reported across all U.S. exchanges, and in the decades we've been following it, there has never been a data error.

If we look at the total amount of money institutions spent on bullish strategies (buying calls and selling puts) minus bearish ones (buying puts and selling calls), it's also at a record spread. They spent $1.6 billion more on bearish strategies than bullish ones. The prior records were $1.1 billion during the week of November 7, 2008 (global financial crisis, Obama victory), and $970 million the week of September 30, 2016 (Deutsche Bank crisis).

Another way to look at this is the average premium institutions pay for calls versus puts. Last week, they spent an average of $153 per call option. But they spent a jaw-dropping $1,638 per put option. When we net those out, it once again shows the sudden and record-shattering demand for protection against a crash.

While many investors like to assume that big money = smart money, that is not the case. On an individual basis, sure. But in aggregate, they suffer from the same biases and tendency toward herd mentality that everyone else does. When they pay up for calls, stocks are usually near a peak; when they panic-buy hedges, stocks are usually near a low.

A fair point could be made that they scrambled for protection right before the Lehman bankruptcy in 2008 and enjoyed windfall profits. Okay, noted. Though we also have to note that they spent even more on puts into October and November and potentially suffered losses as stocks jumped more than 20% into January 2009. And their other forays into massive put buying didn't seem to work out too well, either.

It's not just the options market that is showing heavy bearish bets. Large speculators in S&P 500 e-mini futures have established their largest short position in a decade. As a percentage of open interest, it's among the largest ever.

What the research tells us...

The sudden and massive hedging activity of some of the market's largest traders is unsettling. They have sometimes shown an uncanny ability to buy or sell ahead of significant events in a very short time frame. But the data is too limited to suggest that something is necessarily coming down the pike in the next week or two. More compelling evidence suggests the record put buying is a sign of panic, which has a good track record of preceding rising stock prices over the medium- to long-term.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.