Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Gold - Part II (the bad news)

Jay Kaeppel
2022-02-08
Long-term price movements for gold tend to be cyclical, and a primary cycle is presently in negative territory. Likewise, gold competes with other investment assets, and gold is a clear underperformer. While things can change rapidly, at the moment, gold has some proving to do before a significant long-term commitment seems warranted.

Key Points

  • One of the primary seasonal cycles for gold is in an unfavorable period (and will remain there for some time)
  • A key momentum indicator for gold also remains unfavorable at the moment
  • When both of the indicators are unfavorable, gold performance has historically been abysmal

Gold versus the 4-year cycle

Seasonal and cyclical trends in the financial markets are too often treated as something mystical by adherents - and as a result, are too often dismissed out of hand by many other individuals. But the reality is that seasonal and cyclical trends are much like any other indicator - pieces of the puzzle to be added or subtracted from the weight of the evidence. When used in this manner, seasonal tendencies can offer extremely useful clues in many markets.

Under the category of "hiding in plain sight," the gold market has operated on a fairly reliable 4-year cycle for almost five decades. Let's take a closer look at the results.

  • The first bullish 4-year cycle began on 12/31/1976 and ended 12/31/1980 
  • From there, the first bearish 4-year cycle began on 12/31/1980 and ended on 12/31/1984
  • Bullish and bearish 4-year cycles have alternated ever since
  • The most recent bearish 4-year cycle began on 12/31/2020

The chart below displays the growth of $1 invested in gold ONLY during bullish 4-year cycles since 1976.

The chart below displays the growth of $1 invested in gold ONLY during bearish 4-year cycles since 1976.

The contrast in results is fairly stark. The table below displays the cumulative % performance for gold during bullish and bearish 4-year cycles from 12/31/1976 through 2/4/2022.

Gold versus the S&P 500 Index

I am about to discuss a method I learned from Mark Ungewitter, former Senior Vice President and Senior Investment Officer of Charter Trust Company in Concord, NH. The chart below is from www.Stockcharts.com. The chart shows the price of gold divided by the price of the S&P 500 Index (designated by entering "$GOLD:$SPX" as the Symbol) along with a 200-week exponential moving average of this ratio.

The above chart can be reviewed once a week. In a nutshell:

  • It is considered BULLISH for gold when this ratio is ABOVE the 200-week moving average
  • It is considered BEARISH for gold when this ratio is BELOW the 200-week moving average

At present:

  • The ratio is BELOW the moving average, so the indicator is still considered to be bearish for gold
  • A rise back above the 200-week moving average would suggest a bullish new up leg for the price of gold

Using the Gold/SPX ratio for timing

Let's look at the actual performance of gold during these two different scenarios. The chart below displays the cumulative growth of $1 in gold ONLY when the Gold/SPX ratio is ABOVE its 200-week EMA.

The chart below displays the cumulative growth of $1 in gold ONLY when the Gold/SPX ratio is BELOW its 200-week EMA.

The table below displays the cumulative performance for gold based solely on the method described above from January 1975 into February 2022.

At present, the Gold/SPX ratio remains below its 200-week EMA.

Putting the two together

Now let's consider the performance of gold based on the status of the two indicators above since January 1975 (NOTE: For this test, the period from 1/1/1975 through 12/31/1976 is considered part of a bearish 4-year cycle).

The chart below displays the cumulative growth of $1 in gold when EITHER of the two indicators above is bullish.

The chart below displays the cumulative growth of $1 in gold when BOTH of the two indicators above are bearish.

The table below displays the cumulative performance for gold based solely on the methods described above from January 1975 through May 2021.

What the research tells us…

None of what appears above means that gold cannot stage a meaningful rally. In fact - as we saw in Part I, one indicator suggests good performance for gold in the next 1 to 3 months. Nevertheless, based on the indicators detailed above, gold still has some "proving" to do before investors should feel comfortable piling into a meaningful position.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.